Staerk Laila, Sherer Jason A, Ko Darae, Benjamin Emelia J, Helm Robert H
From the Cardiovascular Research Centre, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark (L.S.); Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, MA (L.S., D.K., E.J.B.); Boston University and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Framingham Heart Study, MA (L.S., E.J.B.); and Department of Medicine (J.A.S.), Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute (D.K., E.J.B.), Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine (D.K., E.J.B., R.H.H.), and Section of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine (E.J.B.), Boston University School of Medicine, MA.
Circ Res. 2017 Apr 28;120(9):1501-1517. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.309732.
The past 3 decades have been characterized by an exponential growth in knowledge and advances in the clinical treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). It is now known that AF genesis requires a vulnerable atrial substrate and that the formation and composition of this substrate may vary depending on comorbid conditions, genetics, sex, and other factors. Population-based studies have identified numerous factors that modify the atrial substrate and increase AF susceptibility. To date, genetic studies have reported 17 independent signals for AF at 14 genomic regions. Studies have established that advanced age, male sex, and European ancestry are prominent AF risk factors. Other modifiable risk factors include sedentary lifestyle, smoking, obesity, diabetes mellitus, obstructive sleep apnea, and elevated blood pressure predispose to AF, and each factor has been shown to induce structural and electric remodeling of the atria. Both heart failure and myocardial infarction increase risk of AF and vice versa creating a feed-forward loop that increases mortality. Other cardiovascular outcomes attributed to AF, including stroke and thromboembolism, are well established, and epidemiology studies have championed therapeutics that mitigate these adverse outcomes. However, the role of anticoagulation for preventing dementia attributed to AF is less established. Our review is a comprehensive examination of the epidemiological data associating unmodifiable and modifiable risk factors for AF and of the pathophysiological evidence supporting the mechanistic link between each risk factor and AF genesis. Our review also critically examines the epidemiological data on clinical outcomes attributed to AF and summarizes current evidence linking each outcome with AF.
在过去的30年里,房颤(AF)临床治疗方面的知识呈指数级增长且取得了显著进展。现在已知房颤的发生需要一个易损心房基质,并且该基质的形成和组成可能因合并症、遗传学、性别和其他因素而有所不同。基于人群的研究已经确定了许多改变心房基质并增加房颤易感性的因素。迄今为止,基因研究已经在14个基因组区域报告了17个与房颤相关的独立信号。研究表明,高龄、男性和欧洲血统是显著的房颤危险因素。其他可改变的危险因素包括久坐不动的生活方式、吸烟、肥胖、糖尿病、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停和高血压,这些因素都易引发房颤,并且每个因素都已被证明会诱发心房的结构和电重构。心力衰竭和心肌梗死都会增加房颤风险,反之亦然,从而形成一个增加死亡率的前馈循环。房颤导致的其他心血管结局,包括中风和血栓栓塞,已得到充分证实,并且流行病学研究支持采用治疗方法来减轻这些不良结局。然而,抗凝治疗在预防房颤所致痴呆方面的作用尚不明确。我们的综述全面审视了与房颤不可改变和可改变危险因素相关的流行病学数据,以及支持每个危险因素与房颤发生之间机制联系的病理生理学证据。我们的综述还严格审查了房颤所致临床结局的流行病学数据,并总结了将每个结局与房颤相关联的现有证据。