Lin Heng, Luo Shuimei, Li Lina, Zhou Sijing, Shen Ruifen, Yang Haitao, Wu Yupeng, Xie Xianhe
Department of Oncology, Fuzhou Pulmonary Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian 350008, P.R. China.
Department of Chemotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350005, P.R. China.
Mol Clin Oncol. 2017 Mar;6(3):296-306. doi: 10.3892/mco.2017.1152. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of different therapeutic regimens for brain metastases (BMs) from lung cancer (LC). A total of 13 controlled trials (1,783 cases) involving chemotherapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors or endostatin plus radiotherapy (combination group) vs. radiotherapy alone group were identified from PubMed. Compared with the radiotherapy alone group, the combination group resulted in a significant benefit for objective response rate (ORR) [risk ratio (RR), 1.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19-1.60; P<0.0001], notably prolonged the time to central nervous system progression [CNS-TTP; hazard ratio (HR), 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57-0.90; P=0.004] and progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.44-0.83; P=0.002); however, failed in prolonging the overall survival (OS; HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.61-1.05; P=0.11) with a higher overall severe adverse events (AEs, Grade ≥3; RR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.24-5.35; P=0.01). Notably, subgroup analysis demonstrated that targeted therapy plus radiotherapy possessed a superior OS compared with radiotherapy alone (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37-0.90; P=0.01) with mild non-hematological toxicity and without severe hematotoxicity. The present study demonstrated that targeted agents plus radiotherapy possessed desirable effects with mild adverse events. Secondary to best, chemoradiotherapy is an alternative option for patients without suitable molecular targets.
本研究旨在探讨不同治疗方案对肺癌脑转移(BMs)的疗效和安全性。从PubMed数据库中检索到13项对照试验(共1783例患者),这些试验比较了化疗、酪氨酸激酶抑制剂或内皮抑素联合放疗(联合治疗组)与单纯放疗组的疗效。与单纯放疗组相比,联合治疗组在客观缓解率(ORR)方面有显著优势[风险比(RR)为1.38;95%置信区间(CI)为1.19 - 1.60;P<0.0001],显著延长了中枢神经系统进展时间[CNS-TTP;风险比(HR)为0.71;95% CI为0.57 - 0.90;P = 0.004]和无进展生存期(PFS;HR为0.60;95% CI为0.44 - 0.83;P = 0.002);然而,联合治疗组未能延长总生存期(OS;HR为0.80;95% CI为0.61 - 1.05;P = 0.11),且总体严重不良事件(AEs,≥3级;RR为2.57;95% CI为1.24 - 5.35;P = 0.01)发生率更高。值得注意的是,亚组分析表明,与单纯放疗相比,靶向治疗联合放疗具有更好的总生存期(HR为0.58;95% CI为0.37 - 0.90;P = 0.01),且非血液学毒性较轻,无严重血液学毒性。本研究表明,靶向药物联合放疗疗效良好,不良事件较轻。次优选择是,对于没有合适分子靶点的患者,放化疗是一种替代方案。