Imagama Shiro, Ito Zenya, Ando Kei, Kobayashi Kazuyoshi, Hida Tetsuro, Ito Kenyu, Ishikawa Yoshimoto, Tsushima Mikito, Matsumoto Akiyuki, Nakashima Hiroaki, Wakao Norimitsu, Sakai Yoshihito, Matsuyama Yukihiro, Ishiguro Naoki
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan.
Global Spine J. 2017 Feb;7(1):6-13. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1580612. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
A retrospective analysis of a prospective database.
To compare preoperative symptoms, ambulatory ability, intraoperative spinal cord monitoring, and pathologic cell proliferation activity between intramedullary only and intramedullary plus extramedullary hemangioblastomas, with the goal of determining the optimal timing for surgery.
The subjects were 28 patients (intramedullary only in 23 cases [group I] and intramedullary plus extramedullary in 5 cases [group IE]) who underwent surgery for spinal hemangioblastoma. Preoperative symptoms, ambulatory ability on the McCormick scale, intraoperative spinal cord monitoring, and pathologic findings using Ki67 were compared between the groups.
In group IE, preoperative motor paralysis was significantly higher (100 versus 26%, < 0.005), the mean period from initial symptoms to motor paralysis was significantly shorter (3.5 versus 11.9 months, < 0.05), and intraoperative spinal cord monitoring aggravation was higher (65 versus 6%, < 0.05). All 5 patients without total resection in group I underwent reoperation. Ki67 activity was higher in group IE (15% versus 1%, < 0.05). Preoperative ambulatory ability was significantly poorer in group IE ( < 0.05), but all cases in this group improved after surgery, and postoperative ambulatory ability did not differ significantly between the two groups.
Intramedullary plus extramedullary spinal hemangioblastoma is characterized by rapid preoperative progression of symptoms over a short period, severe spinal cord damage including preoperative motor paralysis, and poor gait ability compared with an intramedullary tumor only. Earlier surgery with intraoperative spinal cord monitoring is recommended for total resection and good surgical outcome especially for an IE tumor compared with an intramedullary tumor.
对前瞻性数据库进行回顾性分析。
比较单纯髓内型与髓内加髓外型血管母细胞瘤的术前症状、活动能力、术中脊髓监测及病理细胞增殖活性,以确定最佳手术时机。
选取28例行脊髓血管母细胞瘤手术的患者(23例单纯髓内型[I组],5例髓内加髓外型[IE组])。比较两组患者的术前症状、麦考密克量表评估的活动能力、术中脊髓监测情况及Ki67病理结果。
IE组术前运动麻痹发生率显著更高(100% 对26%,<0.005),从初始症状到运动麻痹的平均时间显著更短(3.5个月对11.9个月,<0.05),术中脊髓监测加重情况更高(65% 对6%,<0.05)。I组未全切的5例患者均接受了再次手术。IE组Ki67活性更高(15% 对1%,<0.05)。IE组术前活动能力显著更差(<0.05),但该组所有病例术后均有改善,两组术后活动能力无显著差异。
与单纯髓内肿瘤相比,髓内加髓外型脊髓血管母细胞瘤的特点是术前症状在短时间内快速进展、包括术前运动麻痹在内的严重脊髓损伤以及步态能力差。对于髓内加髓外型肿瘤,建议早期手术并进行术中脊髓监测以实现全切并获得良好手术效果,尤其是与单纯髓内肿瘤相比。