Mitro Peter, Šimurda Miloš, Müller Ervin
Cardiology Clinic, Safarik University, VUSCH, Ondavská 8, 04001, Kosice, Slovakia.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017 Jul;129(13-14):451-457. doi: 10.1007/s00508-017-1197-8. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
The aim of this retrospective single center cohort study was to assess the occurrence of bradycardia during implantable loop recorder (ILR) monitoring in patients with unexplained syncope and negative conventional testing and to identify clinical predictors of bradycardia and pacemaker implantation.
An ILR was implanted in 112 patients (31 men, 81 women, mean age 64 ±13 years) with syncope which was not explained after conventional diagnostic work-up. Clinical variables were compared between patients with and without pacemaker implantation.
A diagnosis was made in 67 patients (60%), including non-arrhythmic (vasodepressor) syncope (27 patients), sinus bradycardia or asystole (23 patients), atrioventricular (AV) block (14 patients) and bradycardic atrial fibrillation (3 patients). The mean time to diagnosis was 233 ± 282 days. A pacemaker was implanted in 40 patients (36%). Male gender, age above 65 years, hypertension, presence of structural heart disease, absence of prodromal symptoms, trauma secondary to syncope, asymptomatic sinus bradycardia and first-degree AV block were clinical predictors of pacemaker implantation in univariate analysis. Of the independent predictive factors three remained significant in multivariate analysis: absence of prodromal symptoms before the loss of consciousness (odds ratio OR 3.38, p = 0.01, 95% confidence interval CI 1.24-9.20), male gender (OR 3.22, p = 0.01, 95% CI 1.26-8.20) and age >65 years (OR 2.94, p = 0.02, 95% CI 1.14-8.33).
In patients undergoing ILR implantation bradycardia is a frequent finding despite the negative conventional diagnostic testing. Absence of prodromal symptoms, male gender and age >65 years are risk factors for bradycardia and pacemaker implantation.
这项回顾性单中心队列研究的目的是评估在不明原因晕厥且传统检查结果为阴性的患者中,植入式循环记录仪(ILR)监测期间心动过缓的发生率,并确定心动过缓和起搏器植入的临床预测因素。
对112例晕厥患者(31例男性,81例女性,平均年龄64±13岁)植入ILR,这些患者在经过传统诊断检查后晕厥原因仍未明确。比较了植入起搏器和未植入起搏器患者的临床变量。
67例患者(60%)确诊,包括非心律失常性(血管迷走性)晕厥(27例)、窦性心动过缓或心搏停止(23例)、房室传导阻滞(14例)和缓慢性心房颤动(3例)。确诊的平均时间为233±282天。40例患者(36%)植入了起搏器。在单因素分析中,男性、年龄大于65岁、高血压、存在结构性心脏病、无前驱症状、晕厥继发外伤、无症状窦性心动过缓和一度房室传导阻滞是起搏器植入的临床预测因素。在多因素分析中,三个独立预测因素仍具有显著意义:意识丧失前无前驱症状(比值比OR 3.38,p = 0.01,95%置信区间CI 1.24 - 9.20)、男性(OR 3.22,p = 0.01,95% CI 1.26 - 8.20)和年龄>65岁(OR 2.94,p = 0.02,95% CI 1.14 - 8.33)。
在接受ILR植入的患者中,尽管传统诊断检查结果为阴性,但心动过缓仍是常见发现。无前驱症状、男性和年龄>65岁是心动过缓和起搏器植入的危险因素。