• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增加血液透析剂量的临床影响。

The Clinical Impact of Increasing the Hemodialysis Dose.

作者信息

Panagoutsos Stelios A, Yannatos Evangelos V, Passadakis Ploumis S, Thodis Elias D, Galtsidopoulos Omiros G, Vargemezis Vassilis A

机构信息

Democritus University of Thrace, Division of Nephrology, G.D. Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, Greece.

出版信息

Hemodial Int. 2001 Jan;5(1):51-54. doi: 10.1111/hdi.2001.5.1.51.

DOI:10.1111/hdi.2001.5.1.51
PMID:28452445
Abstract

Good evidence suggests that improvements in dialysis efficiency reduce morbidity and mortality of hemodialysis (HD) patients. Dialysis efficiency has also been related to better control of arterial blood pressure (BP), anemia, and serum phosphorus levels, and to improvement in patients' nutritional status. Over a 2-year period, the present self-controlled study of 34 HD patients (23 men, 11 women; age, 52.6 ± 14.5 years; HD duration, 55.9 ± 61.2 months) looked at the effect on clinical and laboratory parameters of increasing the delivered dialysis dose under a strict dry-weight policy. Dialysis dose was increased without increasing dialysis time and frequency. A statistically significant increase was seen in delivered HD dose: the urea reduction ratio (URR) increased to 60% ± 10% from 52% ± 8%, and then to 71% ± 7% (p < 0.001); Kt/V increased to 1.22 ± 0.28 from 0.93 ± 0.19, and then to 1.55 ± 0.29 (p < 0.001). A statistically significant increase in hemoglobin concentration also occurred-to 10.8 ± 1.9 g/dL from 10.4 ± 1.7 g/dL, and then to 11.0 ± 1.3 g/dL (p < 0.05 as compared to baseline)-with no significant difference in weekly erythropoietin dose. Statistically significant decreases occurred in the systolic and diastolic blood pressures during the first year; they then remained unchanged. Systolic blood pressure decreased to 131 ± 23 mmHg from 147 ± 24 mmHg (p < 0.001); diastolic blood pressure decreased to 65 ± 11 mmHg from 73 ± 12 mmHg (p < 0.001). Serum albumin increased insignificantly to 4.4 ± 0.4 g/dL from 4.3 ± 0.4 g/dL, and then significantly to 4.6 ± 0.3 g/dL (p = 0.002 as compared to both previous values). Normalized protein catabolic rate increased significantly to 1.16 ± 0.15 g/kg/day from 0.93 ± 0.16 g/kg/ day (p < 0.001), and then to 1.20 ± 0.17 g/kg/day (p < 0.001 as compared to baseline). We conclude that the increases achieved in average Kt/V per hemodialysis session by increasing dialyzer membrane area, and blood and dialysate flows, without increasing dialysis time above 4 hours, in patients hemodialyzed thrice weekly, coupled with strict dry-weight policy, resulted in improvements in hypertension, nutritional status, and anemia.

摘要

有力证据表明,提高透析效率可降低血液透析(HD)患者的发病率和死亡率。透析效率还与更好地控制动脉血压(BP)、贫血和血清磷水平以及改善患者营养状况有关。在为期2年的时间里,本项针对34例HD患者(23例男性,11例女性;年龄52.6±14.5岁;HD病程55.9±61.2个月)的自身对照研究,观察了在严格干体重策略下增加透析剂量对临床和实验室参数的影响。在不增加透析时间和频率的情况下增加了透析剂量。透析剂量显著增加:尿素清除率(URR)从52%±8%增至60%±10%,随后又增至71%±7%(p<0.001);Kt/V从0.93±0.19增至1.22±0.28,随后又增至1.55±0.29(p<0.001)。血红蛋白浓度也出现显著增加——从10.4±1.7g/dL增至10.8±1.9g/dL,随后又增至11.0±1.3g/dL(与基线相比p<0.05),而促红细胞生成素的每周剂量无显著差异。第一年收缩压和舒张压出现显著下降,之后保持不变。收缩压从147±24mmHg降至131±23mmHg(p<0.001);舒张压从73±12mmHg降至65±11mmHg(p<0.001)。血清白蛋白从4.3±0.4g/dL无显著增加至4.4±0.4g/dL,随后显著增至4.6±0.3g/dL(与前两个值相比p=0.002)。标准化蛋白分解代谢率从0.93±0.16g/kg/天显著增至1.16±0.15g/kg/天(p<0.001),随后又增至1.20±0.17g/kg/天(与基线相比p<0.001)。我们得出结论,对于每周进行三次血液透析的患者,在不将透析时间增加至4小时以上的情况下,通过增加透析器膜面积、血液和透析液流量,使每次血液透析疗程的平均Kt/V增加,并结合严格的干体重策略,可改善高血压、营养状况和贫血。

相似文献

1
The Clinical Impact of Increasing the Hemodialysis Dose.增加血液透析剂量的临床影响。
Hemodial Int. 2001 Jan;5(1):51-54. doi: 10.1111/hdi.2001.5.1.51.
2
Effects of hemodialysis dose on anemia, hypertension, and nutrition.血液透析剂量对贫血、高血压和营养状况的影响。
Ren Fail. 2002 Sep;24(5):615-21. doi: 10.1081/jdi-120013965.
3
Effect of long intermittent hemodialysis on improving dialysis adequacy of maintenance hemodialysis patients.长间隔间歇性血液透析对改善维持性血液透析患者透析充分性的效果。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(24):4655-9.
4
[REIN Report 2011--summary].[2011年肾脏疾病改善全球结果(KDIGO)报告——摘要]
Nephrol Ther. 2013 Sep;9 Suppl 1:S3-6. doi: 10.1016/S1769-7255(13)70036-1.
5
Evaluation of dialysis dose during combination therapy with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis.腹膜透析与血液透析联合治疗期间透析剂量的评估。
Adv Perit Dial. 2007;23:135-9.
6
Role of dialysis sodium gradient on intradialytic hypertension: an observational study.透析钠梯度对透析中高血压的作用:一项观察性研究。
Am J Nephrol. 2013;38(5):413-9. doi: 10.1159/000355974. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
7
Epoetin requirement does not depend on dialysis dose when Kt/N > 1.33 in patients on regular dialysis treatment with cellulosic membranes and adequate iron stores.对于使用纤维素膜进行常规透析治疗且铁储备充足的患者,当Kt/N>1.33时,促红细胞生成素的需求量不依赖于透析剂量。
J Nephrol. 2003 Jul-Aug;16(4):546-51.
8
Effect of switching to nocturnal thrice-weekly hemodialysis on clinical and laboratory parameters: our experience.改为每周三次夜间血液透析对临床和实验室参数的影响:我们的经验
Ther Apher Dial. 2013 Aug;17(4):412-5. doi: 10.1111/1744-9987.12088.
9
Increasing dialysate flow rate increases dialyzer urea clearance and dialysis efficiency: an in vivo study.增加透析液流速可提高透析器尿素清除率及透析效率:一项体内研究。
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2009 Nov;20(6):1023-9.
10
Daily hemofiltration for end-stage renal disease: a feasibility and efficacy trial.终末期肾病的每日血液滤过:一项可行性和疗效试验。
Blood Purif. 2004;22(6):481-9. doi: 10.1159/000081722. Epub 2004 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of dialysate flow rate on haemodialysis adequacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.透析液流速对血液透析充分性的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Kidney J. 2024 Jun 4;17(7):sfae163. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae163. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Adequacy of Hemodialysis and Its Associated Factors among Patients Undergoing Chronic Hemodialysis in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆慢性血液透析患者的血液透析充分性及其相关因素
Int J Nephrol. 2020 Feb 10;2020:9863065. doi: 10.1155/2020/9863065. eCollection 2020.