Koko Kiavash R, McCauley Brian M, Gaughan John P, Nolan Ryan S, Fromer Marc W, Hagaman Ashleigh L R, Choron Rachel L, Brown Spencer A, Hazelton Joshua P
From the Cooper University Hospital (K.R.K., B.M.M., J.P.G., R.S.N., M.W.F., A.L., R.H., R.L.C., S.A.B., J.P.H.), Camden, New Jersey.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jul;83(1):71-76. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001492.
Retrohepatic inferior vena cava (RIVC) injuries are often lethal due to challenges in obtaining hemorrhage control. We hypothesized that packing with a new kaolin-based hemostatic dressing (Control+; Z-Medica, Wallingford, CT) would improve hemorrhage control from a penetrating RIVC injury compared with packing with standard laparotomy sponges alone.
Twelve male Yorkshire pigs received a 25% exchange transfusion of blood for refrigerated normal saline to induce a hypothermic coagulopathy. A laparotomy was performed and a standardized 1.5 cm injury to the RIVC was created which was followed by temporary abdominal closure and a period of uncontrolled hemorrhage. When the mean arterial pressure reached 70% of baseline, demonstrating hemorrhagic shock, the abdomen was re-entered, and the injury was treated with perihepatic packing using standard laparotomy sponges (L; n = 6) or a new kaolin-based hemostatic dressing (K; n = 6). Animals were then resuscitated for 6 hours with crystalloid solution. The two groups were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher exact test. A p value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant.
There was no difference in the animal's temperature, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, and blood loss at baseline or before packing was performed (all p > 0.05). In the laparotomy sponge group, five of six pigs survived the entire study period, whereas all six pigs treated with kaolin-based D2 hemostatic dressings survived. Importantly, there was significantly less blood loss after packing with the new hemostatic kaolin-based dressing compared with packing with laparotomy sponge (651 ± 180 mL vs. 1073 ± 342 mL; p ≤ 0.05).
These results demonstrate that the use of this new hemostatic kaolin-based dressing improved hemorrhage control and significantly decreased blood loss in this penetrating RIVC model.
This is basic science research based on a large animal model, level V.
肝后下腔静脉(RIVC)损伤因控制出血困难,常危及生命。我们推测,与仅使用标准剖腹手术海绵进行填塞相比,使用新型高岭土基止血敷料(Control+;Z-Medica,沃灵福德,康涅狄格州)填塞可改善穿透性RIVC损伤的出血控制情况。
12只雄性约克夏猪接受25%的血液与冷藏生理盐水的交换输血,以诱发低温凝血障碍。进行剖腹手术,对RIVC造成标准化的1.5厘米损伤,随后临时关闭腹部,并进行一段时间的未控制出血。当平均动脉压降至基线的70%,表明出现失血性休克时,再次打开腹腔,使用标准剖腹手术海绵(L组;n = 6)或新型高岭土基止血敷料(K组;n = 6)对损伤部位进行肝周填塞。然后用晶体溶液对动物进行6小时的复苏。使用Wilcoxon秩和检验和Fisher精确检验对两组进行比较。p值小于或等于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
在基线时或进行填塞前,两组动物的体温、心率、平均动脉压、心输出量和失血量无差异(所有p > 0.05)。在剖腹手术海绵组中,6只猪中有5只存活至整个研究期,而所有6只接受高岭土基止血敷料治疗的猪均存活。重要的是,与使用剖腹手术海绵填塞相比,使用新型高岭土基止血敷料填塞后的失血量显著减少(651 ± 180毫升对1073 ± 342毫升;p ≤ 0.05)。
这些结果表明,在这个穿透性RIVC模型中,使用这种新型高岭土基止血敷料可改善出血控制并显著减少失血量。
这是基于大型动物模型的基础科学研究,证据水平为V级。