Rogalińska Małgorzata, Góralski Paweł, Błoński Jerzy Z, Robak Paweł, Barciszewski Jan, Koceva-Chyła Aneta, Piekarski Henryk, Robak Tadeusz, Kilianska Zofia M
Department of Cytobiochemistry, University of Lodz, Lodz 90-236, Poland.
Department of Physical Chemistry, University of Lodz, Lodz 90-236, Poland.
Oncol Lett. 2017 Apr;13(4):2079-2084. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.5725. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
There is individual variation in the course of disease development and response to therapy of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Novel treatment options for CLL include a new generation of purine analogs, antibodies and inhibitors of specific cell signaling pathways, which typically induce apoptosis or necrosis. A prospective analysis of patient blood samples revealed that a combination of four tests allowed the most appropriate and effective type of treatment to be selected prior to drug administration, and for the analysis of leukemic cell sensitivity to anticancer drug(s) during disease development. The comparative analysis of blood from the stable and progressive form of CLL in an individual patient revealed diversity in the response to anticancer agents. CLL peripheral blood mononuclear cells were incubated with cladribine + mafosfamide (CM), fludarabine + mafosfamide, CM + rituximab, rituximab alone (Rit) or kinetin riboside (RK). A combination of cell viability, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) profiles of nuclear preparations and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) protein expression analysis of the leukemic cells was performed to evaluate the anticancer effects of the tested agents during CLL development. The results of the present study indicate that such studies are effective in determining the most appropriate anticancer drug and could monitor disease progression on an individual level. In addition, the results of the current study suggest that CLL progression leads to diversification of the cellular drug response. The most efficient apoptosis inducer for the patient was purine analog RK when the disease was stable, while the CM combination was the most effective agent for the progressive form of disease.
慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)患者在疾病发展过程和对治疗的反应方面存在个体差异。CLL的新型治疗选择包括新一代嘌呤类似物、抗体和特定细胞信号通路抑制剂,这些通常会诱导细胞凋亡或坏死。对患者血液样本的前瞻性分析表明,四项检测的组合能够在给药前选择最合适、最有效的治疗类型,并在疾病发展过程中分析白血病细胞对抗癌药物的敏感性。对一名患者稳定期和进展期CLL血液的比较分析显示,其对抗癌药物的反应存在差异。将CLL外周血单核细胞与克拉屈滨+马法兰(CM)、氟达拉滨+马法兰、CM+利妥昔单抗、单独使用利妥昔单抗(Rit)或激动素核糖苷(RK)一起孵育。通过结合细胞活力、细胞核制剂的差示扫描量热法(DSC)图谱以及白血病细胞的聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶1(PARP-1)蛋白表达分析,来评估受试药物在CLL发展过程中的抗癌效果。本研究结果表明,此类研究在确定最合适的抗癌药物方面是有效的,并且可以在个体水平上监测疾病进展。此外,当前研究结果表明,CLL进展会导致细胞药物反应的多样化。当疾病处于稳定期时,对该患者最有效的凋亡诱导剂是嘌呤类似物RK,而CM组合对疾病进展期最为有效。