Suppr超能文献

白天与夜晚:急性心力衰竭患者的就诊时间是否重要?来自RELAX-AHF试验的二次分析。

Day vs night: Does time of presentation matter in acute heart failure? A secondary analysis from the RELAX-AHF trial.

作者信息

Pang Peter S, Teerlink John R, Boer-Martins Leandro, Gimpelewicz Claudio, Davison Beth A, Wang Yi, Voors Adriaan A, Severin Thomas, Ponikowski Piotr, Hua Tsushung A, Greenberg Barry H, Filippatos Gerasimos, Felker G Michael, Cotter Gad, Metra Marco

机构信息

Indiana University School of Medicine & Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN.

University of California-San Francisco and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2017 May;187:62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.02.024. Epub 2017 Feb 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Signs and symptoms of heart failure can occur at any time. Differences between acute heart failure (AHF) patients who present at nighttime vs daytime and their outcomes have not been well studied. Our objective was to determine if there are differences in baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes between AHF patients presenting during daytime vs nighttime hours within an international, clinical trial.

METHODS

This is a post hoc analysis of the RELAX AHF trial, which randomized 1,161 AHF patients to serelaxin vs placebo, both in addition to usual AHF therapy. Prespecified end points of the primary trial were used: dyspnea, 60-day heart failure/renal failure rehospitalization or cardiovascular (CV) death, and 180-day CV death. Both unadjusted and adjusted analyses for outcomes stratified by daytime vs nighttime presentation were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 1,161 RELAX-AHF patients, 775 (66.8%) patients presented during daytime and 386 (33.2%) at nighttime. Baseline characteristics were largely similar, although daytime patients were more likely to be male, have greater baseline body weight, have higher New York Heart Association class, have history of atrial fibrillation, and have more peripheral edema compared with nighttime patients. No differences in dyspnea relief or 60-day outcomes were observed. However, daytime presentation was associated with greater risk for 180-day CV death after adjustment (hazard ratio 2.28, 95% CI 1.34-3.86; c statistic = 0.82, 95% CI 0.78-0.86).

CONCLUSION

In this secondary analysis of the RELAX-AHF trial, baseline characteristics suggest that daytime-presenting patients may have more gradual worsening of chronic HF. Patients with AHF who presented at night had less risk for 180-day CV death, but similar risk for 60-day CV death or rehospitalization and symptom improvement for patients who presented during the daytime.

摘要

背景

心力衰竭的体征和症状可在任何时间出现。急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者在夜间与白天就诊的差异及其预后尚未得到充分研究。我们的目的是确定在一项国际临床试验中,白天与夜间就诊的AHF患者在基线特征和临床结局方面是否存在差异。

方法

这是对RELAX AHF试验的事后分析,该试验将1161例AHF患者随机分为松弛素组和安慰剂组,两组均接受常规AHF治疗。使用了主要试验预先设定的终点:呼吸困难、60天内心力衰竭/肾衰竭再住院或心血管(CV)死亡,以及180天CV死亡。对按白天与夜间就诊分层的结局进行了未调整和调整分析。

结果

在1161例RELAX-AHF患者中,775例(66.8%)在白天就诊,386例(33.2%)在夜间就诊。基线特征大体相似,不过与夜间就诊的患者相比,白天就诊的患者更可能为男性,基线体重更大,纽约心脏协会分级更高,有房颤病史,且外周水肿更多。在呼吸困难缓解或60天结局方面未观察到差异。然而,调整后白天就诊与180天CV死亡风险更高相关(风险比2.28,95%置信区间1.34 - 3.86;c统计量 = 0.82,95%置信区间0.78 - 0.86)。

结论

在这项RELAX-AHF试验的二次分析中,基线特征表明白天就诊的患者慢性心力衰竭可能恶化得更缓慢。夜间就诊的AHF患者180天CV死亡风险较低,但白天就诊的患者60天CV死亡或再住院风险以及症状改善情况相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验