Department of Emergency Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.
National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore.
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Oct;10(5):3164-3173. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14506. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
Hospital admission during nighttime and off hours may affect the outcome of patients with various cardiovascular conditions due to suboptimal resources and personnel availability, but data for acute heart failure remain controversial. Therefore, we studied outcomes of acute heart failure patients according to their time of admission from the global International Registry to assess medical practice with lOngitudinal obseRvation for Treatment of Heart Failure.
Overall, 18 553 acute heart failure patients were divided according to time of admission into 'morning' (7:00-14:59), 'evening' (15:00-22:59), and 'night' (23:00-06:59) shift groups. Patients were also dichotomized to admission during 'working hours' (9:00-16:59 during standard working days) and 'non-working hours' (any other time). Clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were compared across groups. The hospital length of stay was longer for morning (odds ratio: 1.08; 95% confidence interval: 1.06-1.10, P < 0.001) and evening shift (odds ratio: 1.10; 95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.12, P < 0.001) as compared with night shift. The length of stay was also longer for working vs. non-working hours (odds ratio: 1.03; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.05, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality among the groups. Admission during working hours, compared with non-working hours, was associated with significantly lower mortality at 1 year (hazard ratio: 0.88; 95% confidence interval: 0.80-0.96, P = 0.003).
Acute heart failure patients admitted during the night shift and non-working hours had shorter length of stay but similar in-hospital mortality. However, patients admitted during non-working hours were at a higher risk for 1 year mortality. These findings may have implications for the health policies and heart failure trials.
由于夜间和非工作时间资源和人员可用性较差,住院可能会影响各种心血管疾病患者的预后,但急性心力衰竭的数据仍存在争议。因此,我们根据全球国际注册中心的纵向观察治疗心力衰竭的研究结果,研究了急性心力衰竭患者的入院时间与结果之间的关系。
总共,根据入院时间将 18553 例急性心力衰竭患者分为“早晨”(7:00-14:59)、“傍晚”(15:00-22:59)和“夜间”(23:00-06:59)班次组。患者也分为“工作时间”(标准工作日的 9:00-16:59)和“非工作时间”(其他任何时间)入院。比较了各组的临床特征、治疗和结局。与夜间相比,早晨(优势比:1.08;95%置信区间:1.06-1.10,P<0.001)和傍晚(优势比:1.10;95%置信区间:1.07-1.12,P<0.001)的住院时间更长。与非工作时间相比,工作时间的住院时间也更长(优势比:1.03;95%置信区间:1.02-1.05,P<0.001)。各组之间院内死亡率无显著差异。与非工作时间相比,工作时间入院与 1 年死亡率显著降低相关(风险比:0.88;95%置信区间:0.80-0.96,P=0.003)。
夜间和非工作时间入院的急性心力衰竭患者住院时间较短,但院内死亡率相似。然而,非工作时间入院的患者 1 年死亡率更高。这些发现可能对卫生政策和心力衰竭试验有影响。