• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两步法进行妊娠期糖尿病筛查和诊断的人群水平结局。

Population-Level Outcomes with a 2-Step Approach for Gestational Diabetes Screening and Diagnosis.

机构信息

University of Calgary, Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; University of Calgary, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

University of Calgary, Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Diabetes. 2017 Dec;41(6):596-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.12.010. Epub 2017 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.12.010
PMID:28454899
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine outcomes associated with alternative glucose thresholds in a 2-step approach for screening and diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

METHODS

We studied 178,527 pregnancies between 2008 and 2012 in Alberta, Canada. They were categorized retrospectively as normal 50 g screen (n=144,191); normal 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (n=21,248); abnormal at glucose thresholds suggested by the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Group (IADPSG) (HAPO 1.75, n=4308); abnormal at glucose thresholds associated with an odds ratio of 2.0 for adverse events in the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes (HAPO) study. This latter group, which would have been treated for GDM based on customary care, was further divided into those with 1 (HAPO 2-1 n=5528) or 2 or more abnormal glucose values (HAPO 2-2 n=3252). Main outcomes were large for gestational age (LGA), induced labour and Cesarean-section rates.

RESULTS

LGA rates were 8.2%, 10.5%, 14.2%, 11.8% and 16.5% among normal 50 g, normal 75 g OGTT, HAPO 1.75, HAPO 2-1, and HAPO 2-2 groups, respectively. Labour induction and caesarean-section rates were 29.6% and 36.2% in the IADPSG, 38.2% and 36.8% in the HAPO 2-1 group, and 42.3% and 41.1% in the HAPO 2-2 groups, respectively. Excessive maternal weight (≥91 kg) was associated with a higher risk for all adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2-step approach effectively identifies pregnancies at low risk for adverse outcomes. Labelling influences induction practice. Any glucose intolerance increases risk for adverse outcomes, and pregnancies with highest (2 or higher) abnormal glucose values remain at greatest risk. Further research is needed to determine whether glycemic thresholds for GDM diagnosis should incorporate information about maternal weight.

摘要

目的

探讨两步法筛查和诊断妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)时采用不同血糖阈值的结局。

方法

我们对加拿大艾伯塔省 2008 年至 2012 年间的 178527 例妊娠进行了回顾性研究。根据 50g 口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)结果将其分为正常组(n=144191)、正常 75g OGTT 组(n=21248)、国际妊娠合并糖尿病研究组织(IADPSG)建议的血糖阈值异常组(HAPO 1.75mmol/L,n=4308)、与 Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes(HAPO)研究中不良事件比值比为 2.0 相关的血糖阈值异常组(HAPO 2-1mmol/L,n=5528;HAPO 2-2mmol/L,n=3252)。后一组将根据常规治疗诊断为 GDM,进一步分为 HAPO 2-1 组(n=5528,1 个或更多血糖值异常)和 HAPO 2-2 组(n=3252,2 个或更多血糖值异常)。主要结局为巨大儿(LGA)、引产和剖宫产率。

结果

正常 50g、正常 75g OGTT、HAPO 1.75、HAPO 2-1 和 HAPO 2-2 组的 LGA 发生率分别为 8.2%、10.5%、14.2%、11.8%和 16.5%。IADPSG 组的引产率和剖宫产率分别为 29.6%和 36.2%,HAPO 2-1 组分别为 38.2%和 36.8%,HAPO 2-2 组分别为 42.3%和 41.1%。超重(≥91kg)与所有不良结局风险增加相关。

结论

两步法可有效识别不良结局风险低的妊娠。标签会影响引产实践。任何糖耐量异常都会增加不良结局风险,血糖值异常最高(2 个或更多)的妊娠风险最大。需要进一步研究确定 GDM 诊断的血糖阈值是否应纳入母体体重信息。

相似文献

1
Population-Level Outcomes with a 2-Step Approach for Gestational Diabetes Screening and Diagnosis.两步法进行妊娠期糖尿病筛查和诊断的人群水平结局。
Can J Diabetes. 2017 Dec;41(6):596-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.12.010. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
2
The impact of adoption of the international association of diabetes in pregnancy study group criteria for the screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes.国际妊娠糖尿病协会标准用于妊娠期糖尿病筛查和诊断的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):224.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.027. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
3
Association between maternal glucose and large for gestational outcomes: Real-world evidence to support Hyperglycaemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes (HAPO) study findings.母亲血糖与巨大儿结局的关系:支持妊娠高血糖与不良妊娠结局(HAPO)研究结果的真实世界证据。
Diabet Med. 2022 Jun;39(6):e14786. doi: 10.1111/dme.14786. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
4
The incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus before and after the introduction of HAPO diagnostic criteria.采用HAPO诊断标准前后妊娠期糖尿病的发病率。
Ceska Gynekol. 2019 Winter;84(6):404-411.
5
Are There Benefits for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Treating Lower Levels of Hyperglycemia Than Standard Recommendations?妊娠期糖尿病的治疗是否应低于标准建议的血糖水平,以带来获益?
Can J Diabetes. 2016 Dec;40(6):548-554. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
6
[Analysis of the effects of gestational diabetes mellitus based on abnormal blood glucose on pregnancy outcomes].基于血糖异常的妊娠期糖尿病对妊娠结局的影响分析
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Dec;48(12):899-902.
7
Gestational diabetes guidelines in a HAPO world.HAPO 世界中的妊娠糖尿病指南。
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Aug;24(4):673-85. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2010.05.009.
8
Relationship between the IADPSG-criteria-defined abnormal glucose values and adverse pregnancy outcomes among women having gestational diabetes mellitus: A retrospective cohort study.国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组协会(IADPSG)标准定义的血糖异常值与妊娠期糖尿病女性不良妊娠结局之间的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(43):e12920. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012920.
9
Postpartum Diabetes Testing Rates after Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Canadian Women: A Population-Based Study.加拿大女性妊娠期糖尿病产后糖尿病检测率:一项基于人群的研究。
Can J Diabetes. 2017 Dec;41(6):613-620. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.12.013. Epub 2017 May 12.
10
Impact of the IADPSG criteria for gestational diabetes, and of obesity, on pregnancy outcomes.国际糖尿病与妊娠研究组(IADPSG)妊娠糖尿病诊断标准及肥胖对妊娠结局的影响。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Oct;58(5):553-559. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12772. Epub 2018 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Adverse pregnancy outcomes among women in Norway with gestational diabetes using three diagnostic criteria.挪威妊娠期糖尿病女性采用三种诊断标准的不良妊娠结局。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 6;18(7):e0280750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280750. eCollection 2023.
2
Gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.妊娠期糖尿病与不良妊娠结局:系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2022 May 25;377:e067946. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067946.
3
Effect of Different Types of Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Adverse Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.
不同类型的妊娠期糖尿病诊断标准对不良新生儿结局的影响:系统评价、荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Diabetes Metab J. 2022 Jul;46(4):605-619. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2021.0178. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
4
The association between gestational diabetes and stillbirth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.妊娠期糖尿病与死产之间的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetologia. 2022 Jan;65(1):37-54. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05579-0. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
5
The Impact of Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus on Adverse Maternal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.妊娠期糖尿病诊断标准对孕产妇不良结局的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 9;10(4):666. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040666.
6
The impact of differences in plasma glucose between glucose oxidase and hexokinase methods on estimated gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence.葡萄糖氧化酶法和己糖激酶法检测的血浆葡萄糖差值对估计妊娠期糖尿病患病率的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 10;9(1):7238. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43665-x.