Giannotti Nicola, O'Connell Martin J, Foley Shane J, Kelly Peter J, McNulty Jonathan P
Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Radiology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
EJNMMI Res. 2017 Dec;7(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13550-017-0285-0. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) carotid standardised uptake values (SUV) of F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) have been proposed as an inflammatory biomarker for determining cerebrovascular diseases such as stroke. Consideration of varying methodological approaches and software packages is critical to the calculation of accurate SUVs in cross-sectional and longitudinal patient studies. The aim of this study was to investigate whether or not carotid atherosclerotic plaque SUVs are consistent and reproducible between software packages. FDG-PET SUVs of carotids were taken in 101 patients using two different software packages. Quality assurance checks were performed to standardise techniques before commencing the analysis where data from five to seven anatomical sites were measured. A total of ten regions of interest were drawn on each site analysed. Statistical analyses were then performed to compare SUV measurements from the two software packages and to explore reproducibility of measurements. Lastly, the time taken to complete each analysis was measured and compared.
Statistically significant differences in SUV measurements, between the two software packages, ranging from 9 to 21.8% were found depending on ROI location. In 79% (n = 23) of the ROI locations, the differences between the SUV measurements from each software package were found to be statistically significant. The time taken to perform the analyses and export data from the software packages also varied considerably.
This study highlights the importance of standardising all aspects of methodological approaches to ensure accuracy and reproducibility. Physicians must be aware that when a PET-CT data set is analysed, subsequent follow-ups must be verified, if possible, with the same software package or cross-calibration between packages should be performed.
正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(PET-CT)中,F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)颈动脉标准化摄取值(SUV)已被提议作为一种炎症生物标志物,用于确定诸如中风等脑血管疾病。在横断面和纵向患者研究中,考虑不同的方法学途径和软件包对于准确计算SUV至关重要。本研究的目的是调查不同软件包之间颈动脉粥样硬化斑块SUV是否一致且可重复。使用两种不同的软件包对101例患者的颈动脉FDG-PET SUV进行了测量。在开始分析之前进行了质量保证检查,以标准化技术,测量了五到七个解剖部位的数据。在每个分析部位共绘制了十个感兴趣区域。然后进行统计分析,以比较两个软件包的SUV测量值,并探索测量的可重复性。最后,测量并比较完成每次分析所需的时间。
根据感兴趣区域(ROI)的位置,两个软件包之间的SUV测量值存在统计学上的显著差异,范围为9%至21.8%。在79%(n = 23)的ROI位置,发现每个软件包的SUV测量值之间存在统计学上的显著差异。执行分析和从软件包导出数据所需的时间也有很大差异。
本研究强调了标准化方法学方法各个方面以确保准确性和可重复性的重要性。医生必须意识到,在分析PET-CT数据集时,如果可能,后续随访必须使用相同的软件包进行验证,或者应在不同软件包之间进行交叉校准。