Markovinovic Andrea, Cimbro Raffaello, Ljutic Tereza, Kriz Jasna, Rogelj Boris, Munitic Ivana
Laboratory of Molecular Immunology, Department of Biotechnology, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.
Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Prog Neurobiol. 2017 Jul;154:1-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
When optineurin mutations showed up on the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) landscape in 2010, they differed from most other ALS-causing genes. They seemed to act by loss- rather than gain-of-function, and it was unclear how a polyubiquitin-binding adaptor protein, which was proposed to regulate a variety of cellular functions including cell signaling and vesicle trafficking, could mediate neuroprotection. This review discusses the considerable progress that has been made since then. A large number of mutations in optineurin and optineurin-interacting proteins TANK-binding kinase (TBK1) and p62/SQSTM-1 have been found in the ALS patients, suggesting a common neuroprotective pathway. Moreover, functional studies of the ALS-causing optineurin mutations and the recently established optineurin ubiquitin-binding deficient and knockout mouse models helped identify three major mechanisms likely to mediate neuroprotection: regulation of autophagy, mitigation of (chronic) inflammatory signaling, and blockade of necroptosis. These three processes crosstalk, and require multiple levels of control, many of which can be mediated by optineurin. Based on the role of optineurin in multiple processes and the unexpected finding that targeted optineurin deletion in microglia and oligodendrocytes ultimately leads to the same phenotype of axonal degeneration despite different initial defects, we propose that the failure of the weakest link in the optineurin neuroprotective network is sufficient to disturb homeostasis and set-off the domino effect that could ultimately lead to neurodegeneration.
2010年,视紫质神经元(optineurin)突变出现在肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)领域时,它们与大多数其他导致ALS的基因不同。它们似乎是通过功能丧失而非功能获得来起作用的,而且尚不清楚一种被认为可调节包括细胞信号传导和囊泡运输在内的多种细胞功能的多聚泛素结合衔接蛋白如何介导神经保护作用。本综述讨论了自那时以来所取得的重大进展。在ALS患者中发现了视紫质神经元以及与视紫质神经元相互作用的蛋白——TANK结合激酶(TBK1)和p62/SQSTM-1中的大量突变,这表明存在一条共同的神经保护途径。此外,对导致ALS的视紫质神经元突变的功能研究以及最近建立的视紫质神经元泛素结合缺陷和基因敲除小鼠模型,有助于确定可能介导神经保护作用的三种主要机制:自噬调节、减轻(慢性)炎症信号传导以及阻断坏死性凋亡。这三个过程相互影响,需要多个层面的调控,其中许多调控可由视紫质神经元介导。基于视紫质神经元在多个过程中的作用,以及尽管初始缺陷不同,但小胶质细胞和少突胶质细胞中靶向视紫质神经元缺失最终会导致相同的轴突退变表型这一意外发现,我们提出,视紫质神经元神经保护网络中最薄弱环节的失效足以扰乱体内平衡并引发多米诺效应,最终可能导致神经退行性变。