Casaril Aline Etelvina, de Oliveira Liliane Prado, Alonso Diego Peres, de Oliveira Everton Falcão, Gomes Barrios Suellem Petilim, de Oliveira Moura Infran Jucelei, Fernandes Wagner de Souza, Oshiro Elisa Teruya, Ferreira Alda Maria Teixeira, Ribolla Paulo Eduardo Martins, de Oliveira Alessandra Gutierrez
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Av. Costa e Silva s/nº, Campus Universitário, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil; Laboratório de Parasitologia Humana, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campus Universitário s/n, 79070-900 Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.
Curso de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campus Universitário s/n, 79070-900 Campo Grande, MS, Brazil.
Exp Parasitol. 2017 Jun;177:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2017.04.010. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
Standardization of the methods for extraction of DNA from sand flies is essential for obtaining high efficiency during subsequent molecular analyses, such as the new sequencing methods. Information obtained using these methods may contribute substantially to taxonomic, evolutionary, and eco-epidemiological studies. The aim of the present study was to standardize and compare two methods for the extraction of genomic DNA from sand flies for obtaining DNA in sufficient quantities for next-generation sequencing. Sand flies were collected from the municipalities of Campo Grande, Camapuã, Corumbá and Miranda, state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Three protocols using a silica column-based commercial kit (ReliaPrep™ Blood gDNA Miniprep System kit, Promega), and three protocols based on the classical phenol-chloroform extraction method (Uliana et al., 1991), were compared with respect to the yield and quality of the extracted DNA. DNA was quantified using a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer. The presence of sand fly DNA was confirmed by PCR amplification of the IVS6 region (constitutive gene), followed by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel. A total of 144 male specimens were analyzed, 72 per method. Significant differences were observed between the two methods tested. Protocols 2 and 3 of phenol-chloroform extraction presented significantly better performance than all commercial kit extraction protocols tested. For phenol-chloroform extraction, protocol 3 presented significantly better performance than protocols 1 and 2. The IVS6 region was detected in 70 of 72 (97.22%) samples extracted with phenol, including all samples for protocols 2 and 3. This is the first study on the standardization of methods for the extraction of DNA from sand flies for application to next-generation sequencing, which is a promising tool for entomological and molecular studies of sand flies.
白蛉DNA提取方法的标准化对于在后续分子分析(如新型测序方法)中获得高效率至关重要。使用这些方法获得的信息可能对分类学、进化和生态流行病学研究有很大贡献。本研究的目的是标准化和比较两种从白蛉中提取基因组DNA的方法,以便获得足够数量的DNA用于下一代测序。白蛉采自巴西南马托格罗索州的大坎普、卡马普阿、科伦巴和米兰达市。比较了三种使用基于硅胶柱的商业试剂盒(ReliaPrep™ Blood gDNA Miniprep System试剂盒,Promega)的方案和三种基于经典酚 - 氯仿提取方法(Uliana等人,1991年)的方案在提取DNA的产量和质量方面的差异。使用Qubit 2.0荧光计对DNA进行定量。通过对IVS6区域(组成型基因)进行PCR扩增,随后在1.5%琼脂糖凝胶上进行电泳,确认白蛉DNA的存在。共分析了144只雄性标本,每种方法72只。在所测试的两种方法之间观察到显著差异。酚 - 氯仿提取的方案2和方案3的性能明显优于所测试的所有商业试剂盒提取方案。对于酚 - 氯仿提取,方案3的性能明显优于方案1和方案2。在用酚提取的72个样本中的70个(97.22%)中检测到了IVS6区域,包括方案2和方案3的所有样本。这是第一项关于白蛉DNA提取方法标准化以应用于下一代测序的研究,下一代测序是白蛉昆虫学和分子研究的一种有前景的工具。