Centre for Medical Education, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, The Mackenzie Building, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee, DD2 4BF, Scotland, UK.
Chang Gung Medical Education Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 Mar;23(1):75-93. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9775-0. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
Emotion characterises learners' feedback experiences. While the failure-to-fail literature suggests that emotion may be important, little is known about the role of emotion for educators. Secondary analyses were therefore conducted on data exploring 110 trainers' and trainees' feedback experiences. Group and individual narrative interviews were conducted across three UK sites. We analysed 333 narratives for emotional talk using textual analysis: Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Furthermore, thematic framework analysis was conducted on the trainer narratives to explore aspects of feedback processes that are emotional. An additional in-depth little 'd' discourse analysis was conducted on selected trainer narratives to enable us to explore the complex relationship between the whats (reported events) and the hows (emotional talk). Trainer narratives did not differ significantly in positive or negative emotional talk from trainee narratives. By exploring the interplay of the whats and the hows, several aspects of feedback processes were identified as potentially emotional for trainers including trainers being concerned about upsetting learners and worried about patient safety. This was illustrated through numerous linguistic devices to establish emotional tone such as metaphoric talk and laughter. These findings suggest that feedback processes can be emotional for trainers. It highlights the need to better understand the 'filter' of emotion for trainers but also to better understand how emotion plays a role in feedback as a complex social process.
情感是学习者反馈体验的特征。虽然失败-未失败文献表明情绪可能很重要,但对于教育者来说,情绪的作用知之甚少。因此,对探索 110 名培训师和学员反馈体验的数据分析进行了二次分析。在英国的三个地点进行了小组和个人叙事访谈。我们使用文本分析(语言探究和词汇计数)对 333 个叙事中的情感话语进行了分析。此外,对培训师叙事进行了主题框架分析,以探讨反馈过程中情感方面的问题。对选定的培训师叙事进行了额外的深入“小 d”话语分析,使我们能够探讨报告事件和情感话语之间的复杂关系。培训师叙事在积极或消极的情感话语方面与学员叙事没有显著差异。通过探讨事物的相互作用,确定了反馈过程中几个可能对培训师产生情绪的方面,包括培训师担心让学员感到不安和担心患者安全。这通过许多语言手段得以体现,例如隐喻性话语和笑声。这些发现表明,反馈过程可能会让培训师感到情绪激动。它强调了需要更好地理解情感对培训师的“过滤”作用,但也需要更好地理解情感在作为复杂社会过程的反馈中所扮演的角色。