Gross Brian W, Cook Alan D, Rinehart Cole D, Lynch Caitlin A, Bradburn Eric H, Bupp Katherine A, Morrison Chet A, Rogers Frederick B
Trauma Services, Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Penn Medicine Lancaster General Health, Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Trauma Research Program, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Trauma and Critical Care, Chandler Regional Medical Center, Chandler, Arizona.
J Surg Res. 2017 Apr;210:188-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
Gun violence is a controversial public health issue plagued by a lack of recent research. We sought to provide a 13-y overview of firearm hospitalizations in Pennsylvania, analyzing trends in mode, intent, and outcome. We hypothesized that no adjusted change in mortality or functional status at discharge (FSD) would be observed for gunshot wound (GSW) victims over the study period.
All admissions to the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study database from 2003 to 2015 were queried. GSWs were identified by external cause-of-injury codes. Collected variables included patient demographics, firearm type, intent (assault and attempted suicide), FSD, and mortality. Multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression models and ordinal regression analyses using generalized linear mixed models assessed the impact of admission year (continuous) on adjusted mortality and FSD score, respectively. Significance was set at P < 0.05.
Of the 462,081 patients presenting to Pennsylvania trauma centers from 2003 to 2015, 19,342 were GSWs (4.2%). Handguns were the most common weapon of injury (n = 7007; 86.7%) among cases with specified firearm type. Most GSWs were coded as assaults (n = 15,415; 79.7%), with suicide attempts accounting 1866 hospitalizations (9.2%). Suicide attempts were most prevalent among young and middle-aged white males, whereas assaults were more common in young black males. Rates of firearm hospitalizations decreased over time (test of trend P = 0.001); however, admission year was not associated with improved adjusted survival (adjusted odds ratio: 0.99, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-1.01; P = 0.353) or FSD (adjusted odds ratio: 0.99, 95% confidence interval: 0.98-1.00; P = 0.089) while controlling for demographic and injury severity covariates.
Temporal trends in outcomes suggest rates of firearm hospitalizations are declining in Pennsylvania; however, outcomes remain unchanged. To combat this epidemic, a multidisciplinary, demographic-specific approach to prevention should be the focus of future scientific pursuits.
枪支暴力是一个备受争议的公共卫生问题,目前缺乏近期研究。我们试图对宾夕法尼亚州因枪支导致住院的情况进行13年的概述,分析受伤方式、意图和结局的趋势。我们假设在研究期间,枪伤(GSW)受害者出院时的死亡率或功能状态(FSD)不会出现调整后的变化。
查询了2003年至2015年宾夕法尼亚州创伤结局研究数据库中的所有入院病例。通过外部伤害原因编码识别枪伤。收集的变量包括患者人口统计学信息、枪支类型、意图(袭击和自杀未遂)、FSD和死亡率。使用广义线性混合模型的多级混合效应逻辑回归模型和有序回归分析分别评估入院年份(连续变量)对调整后死亡率和FSD评分的影响。显著性设定为P < 0.05。
在2003年至2015年前往宾夕法尼亚州创伤中心就诊的462,081例患者中,19,342例为枪伤(4.2%)。在明确枪支类型的病例中,手枪是最常见的致伤武器(n = 7007;86.7%)。大多数枪伤被编码为袭击(n = 15,415;79.7%),自杀未遂导致1866例住院(9.2%)。自杀未遂在年轻和中年白人男性中最为普遍,而袭击在年轻黑人男性中更为常见。因枪支导致住院的发生率随时间下降(趋势检验P = 0.001);然而,在控制人口统计学和损伤严重程度协变量的情况下,入院年份与调整后生存率的改善(调整后的优势比:0.99,95%置信区间:0.97 - 1.01;P = 0.353)或FSD(调整后的优势比:0.99,95%置信区间:0.98 - 1.00;P = 0.089)无关。
结局的时间趋势表明,宾夕法尼亚州因枪支导致住院的发生率正在下降;然而,结局保持不变。为应对这一流行病,未来科学研究应聚焦于采取多学科、针对特定人群的预防方法。