Open letter to WHO DG candidates: keep policy and priority setting free of commercial influence.
作者信息
Brown Katherine, Rundall Patti, Lobstein Tim, Mwatsana Modi, Jeffery Bill
机构信息
Institute of Alcohol Studies, London, SW1H 0QS, UK.
International Baby Food Action Network, Cambridge, UK.
出版信息
Lancet. 2017 May 13;389(10082):1879. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31146-7. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Open letter to WHO DG candidates: keep policy and priority setting free of commercial influence.致世界卫生组织总干事候选人的公开信：使政策制定和优先事项设定免受商业影响。
Lancet. 2017 May 13;389(10082):1879. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31146-7. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
2
WHO Director-General election: an agenda for the future.世界卫生组织总干事选举：未来议程
Lancet. 2006 Oct 14;368(9544):1311-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69535-4.
3
Historic opportunity for WHO to re-assert leadership.世卫组织重新确立领导地位的历史性机遇。
Lancet. 2006 Oct 21;368(9545):1405-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69584-6.
4
WHO 2007-12: the era of Margaret Chan.世界卫生组织2007 - 2012年：陈冯富珍时代。
Lancet. 2006 Nov 18;368(9549):1743. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69708-0.
5
The next Director-General of WHO.下一任世界卫生组织总干事。
Lancet. 2006 Oct 7;368(9543):1213-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69496-8.
6
How Lee Jong-wook changed WHO.李钟郁如何改变了世界卫生组织。
Lancet. 2006 Jun 3;367(9525):1806-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68787-4.
7
The Election of the Next World Health Organization Director-General Explained to a Visitor From Mars.向来自火星的访客解释下一任世界卫生组织总干事的选举
Am J Public Health. 2016 Nov;106(11):1908-1909. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303457.
8
WHO Director-General election: a more connected WHO.世界卫生组织总干事选举：一个联系更紧密的世界卫生组织。
Lancet. 2006 Oct 21;368(9545):1403-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69583-4.
9
Margaret Chan's vision for WHO.陈冯富珍对世界卫生组织的愿景。
Lancet. 2007 Jun 9;369(9577):1915-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60896-4.
10
WHO leadership: a swift start but with few clear objectives.世卫组织的领导：迅速起步，但目标不够明确。
Lancet. 2002 Sep 14;360(9336):812-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11008-7.
引用本文的文献
1
Qualitative analysis of front-of package labeling policy interactions between stakeholders and Health Canada.对利益相关者与加拿大卫生部之间的包装正面标签政策相互作用进行定性分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 6;11:982908. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.982908. eCollection 2023.
2
Towards Preventing and Managing Conflict of Interest in Nutrition Policy? An Analysis of Submissions to a Consultation on a Draft WHO Tool.迈向预防和管理营养政策中的利益冲突？对世卫组织一份工具草案咨询意见提交材料的分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Mar 15;10(5):255-265. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.52.
3
Comparative Analysis of the Classification of Food Products in the Mexican Market According to Seven Different Nutrient Profiling Systems.根据七种不同的营养成分分类系统对墨西哥市场食品产品的分类进行比较分析。
Nutrients. 2018 Jun 7;10(6):737. doi: 10.3390/nu10060737.
4
Do Nutrient-Based Front-of-Pack Labelling Schemes Support or Undermine Food-Based Dietary Guideline Recommendations? Lessons from the Australian Health Star Rating System.基于营养素的标签方案是否支持或破坏了基于食物的膳食指南推荐？来自澳大利亚星级评分系统的经验教训。
Nutrients. 2018 Jan 5;10(1):32. doi: 10.3390/nu10010032.
Zotero 插件