Sayegh Caitlin S, Huey Stanley J, Barnett Elizabeth, Spruijt-Metz Donna
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, USA; Department of American Studies and Ethnicity, University of Southern California, USA.
J Adolesc. 2017 Jul;58:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
This study tested the efficacy of Motivational Interviewing for improving retention at a "second chance" program in the United States for unemployed young adults who had not graduated high school (ages 18-24; 60% male). We investigated how Motivational Interviewing effects might be mediated by change talk (i.e., arguments for change) and moderated by preference for consistency (PFC). Participants (N = 100) were randomly assigned to (1) Motivational Interviewing designed to elicit change talk, (2) placebo counseling designed not to elicit change talk, or (3) no additional treatment. Motivational Interviewing sessions increased change talk, but did not increase program retention or diploma earning. PFC was a significant moderator of Motivational Interviewing's impact on program retention; Motivational Interviewing was most effective at increasing 8 week retention for high PFC participants, and least effective for low PFC participants. These results suggest that Motivational Interviewing could be a useful tool for improving retention in education and employment programs, but clinicians should be attentive to how participant characteristics might enhance or diminish Motivational Interviewing effects.
本研究在美国一项针对未高中毕业的失业青年(年龄18 - 24岁;60%为男性)的“二次机会”项目中,测试了动机性访谈对于提高留存率的效果。我们调查了动机性访谈的效果可能如何通过改变谈话(即支持改变的论据)来介导,以及如何受到一致性偏好(PFC)的调节。参与者(N = 100)被随机分配到:(1)旨在引发改变谈话的动机性访谈组,(2)旨在不引发改变谈话的安慰剂咨询组,或(3)无额外治疗组。动机性访谈环节增加了改变谈话,但并未提高项目留存率或毕业文凭获得率。PFC是动机性访谈对项目留存率影响的一个显著调节因素;动机性访谈在提高高PFC参与者的8周留存率方面最有效,而对低PFC参与者效果最差。这些结果表明,动机性访谈可能是提高教育和就业项目留存率的有用工具,但临床医生应注意参与者特征可能如何增强或削弱动机性访谈的效果。