Suppr超能文献

在危害分析与关键控制点(HACCP)课程中评估一个用于教授危害和风险的主动学习模块。

Evaluation of an active learning module to teach hazard and risk in Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) classes.

作者信息

Oyarzabal Omar A, Rowe Ellen

机构信息

University of Vermont Extension, St. Albans, VT 05478, USA.

University of Vermont Extension, St. Johnsbury, VT 05819, USA.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2017 Apr 17;3(4):e00297. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00297. eCollection 2017 Apr.

Abstract

The terms hazard and risk are significant building blocks for the organization of risk-based food safety plans. Unfortunately, these terms are not clear for some personnel working in food manufacturing facilities. In addition, there are few examples of active learning modules for teaching adult participants the principles of hazard analysis and critical control points (HACCP). In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of an active learning module to teach hazard and risk to participants of HACCP classes provided by the University of Vermont Extension in 2015 and 2016. This interactive module is comprised of a questionnaire; group playing of a dice game that we have previously introduced in the teaching of HACCP; the discussion of the terms hazard and risk; and a self-assessment questionnaire to evaluate the teaching of hazard and risk. From 71 adult participants that completed this module, 40 participants (56%) provided the most appropriate definition of hazard, 19 participants (27%) provided the most appropriate definition of risk, 14 participants (20%) provided the most appropriate definitions of both hazard and risk, and 23 participants (32%) did not provide an appropriate definition for hazard or risk. Self-assessment data showed an improvement in the understanding of these terms (P < 0.05). Thirty participants (42%) stated that the most valuable thing they learned with this interactive module was the difference between hazard and risk, and 40 participants (65%) responded that they did not attend similar presentations in the past. The fact that less than one third of the participants answered properly to the definitions of hazard and risk at baseline is not surprising. However, these results highlight the need for the incorporation of modules to discuss these important food safety terms and include more active learning modules to teach food safety classes. This study suggests that active learning helps food personnel better understand important food safety terms that serve as building blocks for the understanding of more complex food safety topics.

摘要

危害和风险这两个术语是基于风险的食品安全计划组织的重要组成部分。不幸的是,对于一些在食品制造设施中工作的人员来说,这些术语并不清晰。此外,几乎没有针对成年参与者教授危害分析与关键控制点(HACCP)原则的主动学习模块的示例。在本研究中,我们评估了一个主动学习模块对2015年和2016年由佛蒙特大学推广部提供的HACCP课程参与者教授危害和风险的有效性。这个互动模块由一份问卷、我们之前在HACCP教学中引入的掷骰子游戏的小组玩法、危害和风险术语的讨论以及一份用于评估危害和风险教学的自我评估问卷组成。在完成该模块的71名成年参与者中,40名参与者(56%)给出了最恰当的危害定义,19名参与者(27%)给出了最恰当的风险定义,14名参与者(20%)给出了危害和风险的最恰当定义,23名参与者(32%)没有给出危害或风险的恰当定义。自我评估数据显示对这些术语的理解有了提高(P<0.05)。30名参与者(42%)表示他们从这个互动模块中学到的最有价值的东西是危害和风险之间的区别,40名参与者(65%)回答说他们过去没有参加过类似的讲座。不到三分之一的参与者在基线时对危害和风险的定义回答正确这一事实并不奇怪。然而,这些结果凸显了纳入讨论这些重要食品安全术语的模块以及包括更多主动学习模块来教授食品安全课程的必要性。这项研究表明,主动学习有助于食品从业人员更好地理解作为理解更复杂食品安全主题基石的重要食品安全术语。

相似文献

3
Current status and frontier tracking of the China HACCP system.中国HACCP体系的现状与前沿追踪
Front Nutr. 2023 Mar 14;10:1072981. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1072981. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Technical assistance in the field of risk communication.风险沟通领域的技术援助。
EFSA J. 2021 Apr 29;19(4):e06574. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6574. eCollection 2021 Apr.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验