Odeyemi Yewande E, Meda Edris, Ogundipe Funmilola, Russ Ebony, Mehari Alem, Obisesan Thomas, Gillum Richard F
Division of Pulmonary Diseases, Department of Medicine, Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Department of Internal Medicine, Howard University Hospital, Washington, DC.
Clin Respir J. 2018 Mar;12(3):1141-1149. doi: 10.1111/crj.12643. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
To test the hypothesis that cognitive impairment increases mortality independent of airflow obstruction.
In 1988-1994 the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) measured forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and the forced vital capacity (FVC) and selected items on cognitive function with mortality follow-up. For this survival analysis 4365 persons aged 60 and over with complete data formed the analytic sample.
The FEV1/FVC less than the lower limit of predicted ratio (LLP) defined airflow obstruction and Composite Cognitive Function Score (CCF) ≤4, cognitive impairment. The percentage who died during follow up was 67% among those with neither FEV1/FVC < LLP nor CCF ≤4, 82% with FEV1/FVC < LLP only, 85% with CCF score ≤4 only and 93% with both FEV1/FVC LLP and CCF score ≤4 (P < .001). Weighted Cox proportional hazards regression revealed an increased hazard ratio (HR) in persons with FEV1/FVC <LLP only and in persons with CCF ≤4 only, respectively, compared with persons with neither. FEV1/FVC ratio < LLP remained a significant predictor of mortality with an interaction between FEV1/FVC ratio < LLP and CCF ≤4 (P = .051).
Elderly persons with either airflow obstruction or cognitive impairment or both had increased all-cause mortality when compared to those with neither after adjusting for confounders. However, cognitive impairment was not a predictor of increased mortality independent of airflow obstruction.
检验认知障碍会增加死亡率这一独立于气流阻塞的假设。
在1988 - 1994年期间,第三次全国健康与营养检查调查(NHANES III)测量了第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)和用力肺活量(FVC),并选取了认知功能项目进行死亡率随访。对于此次生存分析,4365名60岁及以上且数据完整的人员构成了分析样本。
FEV1/FVC低于预测比值下限(LLP)定义为气流阻塞,综合认知功能评分(CCF)≤4定义为认知障碍。在随访期间,既没有FEV1/FVC <LLP也没有CCF≤4的人群中死亡百分比为67%,仅FEV1/FVC <LLP的人群中为82%,仅CCF评分≤4的人群中为85%,同时有FEV1/FVC <LLP和CCF评分≤4的人群中为93%(P <.001)。加权Cox比例风险回归显示,仅FEV1/FVC <LLP的人群和仅CCF≤4的人群与既没有气流阻塞也没有认知障碍的人群相比,风险比(HR)均升高。FEV1/FVC比值<LLP仍然是死亡率的显著预测因素,且FEV1/FVC比值<LLP与CCF≤4之间存在交互作用(P = 0.051)。
在调整混杂因素后,与既没有气流阻塞也没有认知障碍的老年人相比,有气流阻塞或认知障碍或两者皆有的老年人全因死亡率增加。然而,认知障碍并非独立于气流阻塞的死亡率增加的预测因素。