Suppr超能文献

院外心脏骤停复苏尝试期间的高级气道类型及其与胸外按压中断的关联。

Advanced Airway Type and Its Association with Chest Compression Interruptions During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Attempts.

作者信息

Jarman Angela F, Hopkins Christy L, Hansen J Nicholas, Brown Jonathan R, Burk Christopher, Youngquist Scott T

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Sep-Oct;21(5):628-635. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1308611. Epub 2017 May 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess interruptions in chest compressions associated with advanced airway placement during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) victims.

METHODS

The method used was observational analysis of prospectively collected clinical and defibrillator data from 339 adult OHCA victims, excluding victims with <5 minutes of CPR. Interruptions in CPR, summarized by chest compression fraction (CCF), longest pause, and the number of pauses greater than 10 seconds, were compared between patients receiving bag valve mask (BVM), supraglottic airway (SGA), endotracheal intubation (ETI) via direct laryngoscopy (DL), and ETI via video laryngoscopy (VL). Secondary outcomes included first pass success and the effect of multiple airway attempts on CPR interruptions.

RESULTS

During the study period, paramedics managed 23 cases with BVM, 43 cases with SGA, 148 with DL, and 125 with VL. There were no statistically significant differences between the airway groups with regard to longest compression pause (BVM 18 sec [IQR 11-33], SGA 29 sec [IQR 15-65], DL 26 sec [IQR 12-59], VL 22 sec [IQR 14-41]), median number of pauses greater than 10 seconds (BVM 2 [IQR 1-3], SGA 2 [IQR 1-3], DL 2 [IQR 1-4], VL 2 [IQR 1-3]), or CCF (0.92 for all groups). However, each additional attempt following failed initial DL was associated with an increase in the risk of additional chest compression pauses (relative risk 1.29, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.64). Such an association was not observed with additional attempts using VL or SGA. First pass success was highest with SGA (77%), followed by between DL (68%) and VL (67%); these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

While summary measures of chest compression delivery did not differ significantly between airway classes in this observational study, repeated attempts following failed initial DL during cardiopulmonary resuscitation were associated with an increase in the number of pauses in chest compression delivery observed.

摘要

目的

评估院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者心肺复苏(CPR)期间与高级气道置入相关的胸外按压中断情况。

方法

采用的方法是对前瞻性收集的339例成年OHCA患者的临床和除颤器数据进行观察性分析,排除心肺复苏时间小于5分钟的患者。比较接受袋阀面罩(BVM)、声门上气道(SGA)、直接喉镜(DL)下气管插管(ETI)和视频喉镜(VL)下ETI的患者之间心肺复苏的中断情况,以胸外按压分数(CCF)、最长停顿时间和停顿超过10秒的次数进行总结。次要结局包括首次成功置入和多次气道尝试对心肺复苏中断的影响。

结果

在研究期间,护理人员处理了23例使用BVM的病例、43例使用SGA的病例、148例使用DL的病例和125例使用VL的病例。气道组之间在最长按压停顿时间(BVM为18秒[四分位间距11 - 33],SGA为29秒[四分位间距15 - 65],DL为26秒[四分位间距12 - 59],VL为22秒[四分位间距14 - 41])、停顿超过10秒的中位数次数(BVM为2次[四分位间距1 - 3],SGA为2次[四分位间距1 - 3],DL为2次[四分位间距1 - 4],VL为2次[四分位间距1 - 3])或CCF(所有组均为0.92)方面无统计学显著差异。然而,首次DL失败后的每一次额外尝试都与额外胸外按压停顿风险的增加相关(相对风险1.29,95%置信区间1.02 - 1.64)。使用VL或SGA进行额外尝试时未观察到这种关联。首次成功置入率最高的是SGA(77%),其次是DL(68%)和VL(67%)之间;这些差异无统计学显著性。

结论

在这项观察性研究中,虽然不同气道类别之间胸外按压实施的总结指标没有显著差异,但心肺复苏期间首次DL失败后的重复尝试与观察到的胸外按压停顿次数增加相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验