• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

协作质量改进

Collaborative quality improvement.

作者信息

Luckenbaugh Amy N, Miller David C, Ghani Khurshid R

机构信息

Dow Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Curr Opin Urol. 2017 Jul;27(4):395-401. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000404.

DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000000404
PMID:28459792
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Quality improvement collaboratives were developed in many medical and surgical disciplines with the goal of measuring and improving the quality of care provided to patients. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of surgical quality improvement collaboratives, and in particular those aimed at improving urological care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Quality improvement collaboratives collect high-quality data using standardized methodologies, and use the data to provide feedback to physicians and practices, and then implement processes to improve patient outcomes. The largest regional collaborative in urology is the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC). Recent efforts by this group have been focused at understanding variation in care, improving patient selection for treatment, reducing treatment morbidity and measuring and optimizing technical skill. The American Urological Association has also recently launched a national quality registry (AQUA), with an initial focus on prostate cancer care.

SUMMARY

By understanding factors that result in exemplary performance, quality improvement collaboratives are able to develop best practices around areas of care with high variation that have the potential to improve outcomes and reduce costs. These developments have been made possible by the unique model offered by the collaborative structure with the goal of improving patient care at a population level.

摘要

综述目的

质量改进协作组织在许多医学和外科学科中得以发展,目的是衡量并提高为患者提供的医疗服务质量。本综述旨在概述外科质量改进协作组织,尤其是那些旨在改善泌尿外科护理的组织。

最新发现

质量改进协作组织采用标准化方法收集高质量数据,并利用这些数据向医生和医疗机构提供反馈,然后实施相关流程以改善患者预后。泌尿外科领域最大的区域协作组织是密歇根泌尿外科手术改进协作组织(MUSIC)。该组织近期的工作重点是了解护理差异、改善治疗的患者选择、降低治疗发病率以及衡量和优化技术技能。美国泌尿外科协会最近还推出了一个全国性质量登记系统(AQUA),初期重点关注前列腺癌护理。

总结

通过了解促成卓越表现的因素,质量改进协作组织能够围绕护理差异较大且有可能改善预后和降低成本的领域制定最佳实践方案。协作结构所提供的独特模式使得在人群层面改善患者护理成为可能,从而实现了这些进展。

相似文献

1
Collaborative quality improvement.协作质量改进
Curr Opin Urol. 2017 Jul;27(4):395-401. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000404.
2
Improvement in clinical TNM staging documentation within a prostate cancer quality improvement collaborative.前列腺癌质量改进协作组中临床 TNM 分期文件的改进。
Urology. 2014 Apr;83(4):781-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.11.040.
3
The Michigan Spine Surgery Improvement Collaborative: a statewide Collaborative Quality Initiative.密歇根脊柱手术改善协作组织:一项全州范围的协作质量倡议。
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Dec;39(6):E7. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.FOCUS15370.
4
The past, present, and future of urological quality improvement collaboratives.泌尿外科质量改进协作组织的过去、现在与未来。
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 May;10(5):2280-2288. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.10.18.
5
Quality of Care in Urology and the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative.泌尿外科的医疗质量与密歇根泌尿外科手术改进协作组织
Urol Pract. 2014 Jul;1(2):74-78. doi: 10.1016/j.urpr.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 May 1.
6
Contemporary use of initial active surveillance among men in Michigan with low-risk prostate cancer.密歇根州低危前列腺癌男性中初始主动监测的当代应用。
Eur Urol. 2015 Jan;67(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.024. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
7
Improving quality through clinical registries in urology.通过泌尿外科临床登记提高质量。
Curr Opin Urol. 2017 Jul;27(4):375-379. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000406.
8
Defining Quality Metrics for Active Surveillance: The Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative Experience.定义主动监测的质量指标:密歇根泌尿外科手术改进协作组的经验
J Urol. 2020 Dec;204(6):1119-1121. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001308. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
9
Leveraging the clinical collaborative model to drive value improvement.利用临床协作模式推动价值提升。
Curr Opin Urol. 2018 Jul;28(4):348-353. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000514.
10
Establishment of a urological surgery quality collaborative.建立泌尿外科手术质量协作组。
J Urol. 2010 Dec;184(6):2485-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.015. Epub 2010 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring Graduate Medical Education Outcomes to Honor the Social Contract.衡量研究生医学教育成果,履行社会契约。
Acad Med. 2022 May 1;97(5):643-648. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004592. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
2
Ethical Issuing Arising Around Biliary Interventions.胆道介入治疗引发的伦理问题
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2021 Aug;38(3):388-392. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731407. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
3
The past, present, and future of urological quality improvement collaboratives.泌尿外科质量改进协作组织的过去、现在与未来。
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 May;10(5):2280-2288. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.10.18.
4
Quality improvement in hospitals' surgery-related processes: A systematic review.医院手术相关流程的质量改进:一项系统综述。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 Dec 2;33:129. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.33.129. eCollection 2019.
5
Evaluation of Access to Hospitals Most Ready to Achieve National Accreditation for Rectal Cancer Treatment.评估最有资格获得直肠癌治疗国家认证的医院的准入情况。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jun 1;154(6):516-523. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5521.