Suppr超能文献

肥胖症手术候选人的不良进食行为评估:饮食障碍诊断量表的评估。

Maladaptive eating behavior assessment among bariatric surgery candidates: Evaluation of the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale.

机构信息

Kent State University, Kent, Ohio.

Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma.

出版信息

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Jul;13(7):1183-1188. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Eating pathology among bariatric surgery candidates is common and associated with adverse outcomes. However, its assessment is complicated by the inconsistent use of standardized measures. We addressed this by examining the use of the Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale (EDDS) in a large bariatric sample (N = 343).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the EDDS among bariatric surgery candidates via examination of: (1) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR) and fifth edition (DSM-5) rates of binge eating disorder, bulimia nervosa, and maladaptive eating behaviors, and (2) the relationship between response biases and self-reported eating disorder symptoms.

SETTING

Participants were bariatric surgery candidates at a large public hospital in the Midwest.

METHODS

As part of a larger preoperative evaluation, 343 patients seeking bariatric surgery completed the EDDS and measures of problematic response bias.

RESULTS

Approximately 16% of the sample met full threshold criteria for binge eating disorder using DSM-5 criteria. Using the DSM-IV-TR, rates were lower but still substantial at 13%. Rates for bulimia nervosa were 8% (DSM-5) and 6% (DSM-IV-TR). The majority (66.1%) of participants reported at least one binge-eating episode per week. The most commonly used compensatory behavior was fasting (20.4%), followed by excessive exercise (11.7%), laxative use (5.6%), and vomiting (1.8%). An inverse relationship between severity of the eating symptomatology and problematic response bias emerged.

CONCLUSION

The EDDS shows promise as a screening tool that uses diagnostic criteria to provide rates of binge eating and eating psychopathology among surgical candidates. Our findings suggest that subsequent validation studies of this measure are needed, should address potential response bias concerns, and should employ clear definitions of binge eating to promote standardization of eating pathology assessment in the bariatric population.

摘要

背景

在接受减重手术的患者中,饮食失调较为常见,且与不良后果相关。然而,由于标准化测量工具的使用不一致,其评估较为复杂。我们通过对 343 名大型减重样本中饮食障碍诊断量表(EDDS)的使用情况进行研究来解决这一问题。

目的

通过检查以下方面,评估 EDDS 在减重手术候选者中的应用:(1)DSM-IV-TR 和 DSM-5 中暴食障碍、神经性贪食症和适应不良进食行为的诊断率,以及(2)反应偏差与自我报告的饮食障碍症状之间的关系。

设置

参与者为中西部一家大型公立医院的减重手术候选者。

方法

作为术前评估的一部分,343 名寻求减重手术的患者完成了 EDDS 和有问题的反应偏差测量。

结果

根据 DSM-5 标准,约 16%的样本符合暴食障碍的全阈值标准。根据 DSM-IV-TR,比率较低,但仍有 13%的人符合标准。神经性贪食症的比率分别为 8%(DSM-5)和 6%(DSM-IV-TR)。大多数(66.1%)参与者每周至少有一次暴食发作。最常使用的补偿行为是禁食(20.4%),其次是过度运动(11.7%)、泻药使用(5.6%)和呕吐(1.8%)。进食症状严重程度与有问题的反应偏差呈负相关。

结论

EDDS 有望成为一种筛查工具,它使用诊断标准来提供手术候选者中暴食和进食心理障碍的比率。我们的研究结果表明,需要对该测量工具进行进一步的验证研究,应解决潜在的反应偏差问题,并应采用明确的暴食定义,以促进在减重人群中进食障碍的评估标准化。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验