Institut Nacional d'Educació Física de Catalunya Barcelona (INEFC), Avinguda de l'Estadi 12-22, Anella Olímpica, 08038 Barcelona; and Manresa University (Univeritat de Vic Universitat Central de Catalunya), Avinguda Universitària 4-6, 08242 Manresa, Barcelona, Spain(∗).
Department of Sports Performance, Institut Nacional d'Educació Física de Catalunya Barcelona (INEFC), Anella Olímpica, Barcelona, Spain(†).
PM R. 2017 Nov;9(11):1106-1116. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) affects a large proportion of the population and has been associated with different muscle dysfunctions. However, there is no consensus regarding muscle electromyography and kinematic patterns during fatiguing tasks.
To examine whether trunk and limb muscle fatigability and activation patterns of individuals suffering CLBP differ from those of healthy participants during a holding task.
Cross-sectional study.
Clinical research laboratory.
Twenty-four participants with CLBP and 26 matched healthy controls.
Both groups performed a static holding task, in a semisquat position, until exhaustion. The performance variable was time to failure. Electromyography signs, such as median frequency and root mean square, were used to quantify fatigability by applying linear regression to each of the 3 successive test periods. Kinematic variables were monitored throughout the holding task.
Independent t tests were used to compare time to failure. Electromyography-based measures of muscle fatigability were examined through a two-way, repeated-measures analysis of variance (mixed-model), whereas kinematic analysis was based on 2 multivariate analyses of variance.
Although the groups differed in time to failure (healthy group: mean 201.6 seconds, SD 98.9 seconds; CLBP: mean 132.4 seconds, SD 78.9 seconds; P =.009), no statistically significant differences were found in electromyography-based measures of muscle fatigability, except for the internal oblique muscle. Kinematic variables were similar in the 2 groups.
Despite similar electromyography fatigability in the 2 groups, individuals with CLBP seem to be more sensitive to certain effects of back muscle fatigue. Significant differences in electromyography measurements in the internal oblique muscle, both between groups and across periods, suggest that individuals with CLBP trigger a subtly different activation pattern to control the spine. In a holding task, compared with healthy people, this may represent a compensatory behavior aimed at adapting to certain deficits in spine control or pain.
II.
慢性下腰痛(CLBP)影响了很大一部分人群,并且与不同的肌肉功能障碍有关。然而,在疲劳任务中,关于肌肉肌电图和运动学模式,尚未达成共识。
检查患有 CLBP 的个体与健康参与者在进行保持任务时,其躯干和肢体肌肉疲劳性和激活模式是否存在差异。
横断面研究。
临床研究实验室。
24 名 CLBP 患者和 26 名匹配的健康对照者。
两组均以半蹲姿势进行静态保持任务,直到疲劳。性能变量为失效时间。通过对每个连续的 3 个测试阶段应用线性回归,使用肌电图的中值频率和均方根等指标来量化肌肉疲劳性。在整个保持任务过程中监测运动学变量。
使用独立 t 检验比较失效时间。通过双因素重复测量方差分析(混合模型)检查基于肌电图的肌肉疲劳性测量指标,而运动学分析则基于 2 个多元方差分析。
尽管两组在失效时间方面存在差异(健康组:平均 201.6 秒,SD 98.9 秒;CLBP 组:平均 132.4 秒,SD 78.9 秒;P =.009),但除了内斜肌外,基于肌电图的肌肉疲劳性测量指标没有统计学上的显著差异。两组的运动学变量相似。
尽管两组的肌电图疲劳性相似,但患有 CLBP 的个体似乎对背肌疲劳的某些影响更为敏感。内斜肌的肌电图测量值在组间和各期之间均存在显著差异,这表明患有 CLBP 的个体触发了一种微妙不同的激活模式来控制脊柱。与健康人相比,在保持任务中,这可能代表了一种代偿行为,旨在适应脊柱控制或疼痛方面的某些缺陷。
II。