Román-Rodríguez Miguel, Ibarrola-Ruiz Lara, Mora Fernando, Plaza Vicente, Sastre Joaquín, Torrego Alfonso, Vega José María, Sánchez-Herrero Guadalupe
Centro de Salud Son Pisà, IB-Salut, Balearic Health Service, Unidad de investigación en enfermedades crónicas respiratorias en atención primaria, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Baleares (IdISBa), Palma de Mallorca.
GSK.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Apr 21;11:811-820. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S127645. eCollection 2017.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the attitudes and perceptions of health care professionals (HCPs) who have been trained in motivational interviewing (MI) to improve adherence. Another objective of this study was to compare groups of HCPs with different levels of training in adherence (trained vs untrained; previous training in adherence education [AdhE] vs specific training in MI).
For this study, a national questionnaire-based survey was conducted among HCPs treating asthma. A total of 360 HCPs were surveyed (allergists: n=110; pulmonologists: n=120; general practitioners: n=130). Of them, 180 physicians had received a training intervention (training in AdhE: n=90; training in MI to promote adherence: n=90).
Of the total surveyed HCPs, 92.8% reported adherence is highly important in asthma control. More professionals trained in MI compared to those trained in AdhE considered that "simplifying treatment as far as possible" (85.6% vs 68.9%, =0.0077), "involving the patient in treatment plans" (85.6% vs 71.1%, =0.0187), "giving the patient self-care patterns" (52.2% vs 36.7%, =0.0357) and "performing MI" (42.2% vs 15.6%, <0.0001) were the most important interventions to promote adherence. "Empathy between doctor and patient" (93.3% vs 77.8%, =0.0036) and "concordance of medical and patient treatment goals" (96.7% vs 72.2%, <0.0001) were the factors perceived as having the greatest influence in improving adherence to asthma treatment by the physicians in the MI group as opposed to those in the AdhE group. The use of MI in asthma consultation was the most highly valued resource to promote adherence to treatment among all the professionals, particularly those who had received specific MI training compared to those who had received any kind of previous training in AdhE (96.7% vs 66.7%, <0.0001).
MI is considered an important tool to promote adherence to asthma treatment among HCPs, especially among those specifically trained in that aspect. MI training interventions seem to influence HCPs' approaches to improve self-care and to engage patients in treatment plans rather than approaches solely centered on AdhE.
本研究旨在评估接受过动机性访谈(MI)培训以提高依从性的医护人员(HCPs)的态度和认知。本研究的另一个目的是比较不同依从性培训水平的医护人员组(受过培训与未受过培训;以前接受过依从性教育[AdhE]培训与接受过MI专项培训)。
在本研究中,对治疗哮喘的医护人员进行了一项基于全国性问卷的调查。共调查了360名医护人员(过敏症专科医生:n = 110;肺病专家:n = 120;全科医生:n = 130)。其中,180名医生接受了培训干预(接受AdhE培训:n = 90;接受促进依从性的MI培训:n = 90)。
在接受调查的医护人员中,92.8%报告称依从性在哮喘控制中非常重要。与接受AdhE培训的人员相比,接受MI培训的医护人员中更多人认为“尽可能简化治疗”(85.6%对68.9%,P = 0.0077)、“让患者参与治疗计划”(85.6%对71.1%,P = 0.0187)、“给予患者自我护理模式”(52.2%对36.7%,P = 0.0357)和“进行MI”(42.2%对15.6%,P<0.0001)是促进依从性的最重要干预措施。与AdhE组的医生相比,MI组的医生认为“医患之间的同理心”(93.3%对77.8%,P = 0.0036)和“医疗与患者治疗目标的一致性”(96.7%对72.2%,P<0.0001)是在提高哮喘治疗依从性方面影响最大的因素。在所有专业人员中,尤其是与那些以前接受过任何AdhE培训的人员相比,接受过MI专项培训的人员,在哮喘咨询中使用MI是促进治疗依从性最受重视的方法(96.7%对66.7%,P<0.0001)。
MI被认为是促进医护人员对哮喘治疗依从性的重要工具,尤其是在那些接受过该方面专项培训的人员中。MI培训干预似乎会影响医护人员改善自我护理以及让患者参与治疗计划的方法,而不仅仅是那些仅以AdhE为中心的方法。