• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于从英格兰患者和医疗从业者角度调查哮喘药物处方及依从性的在线调查

Online Survey to Investigate Asthma Medication Prescription and Adherence from the Perspective of Patients and Healthcare Practitioners in England.

作者信息

Zhang Xiubin, Quint Jennifer K

机构信息

National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, W12 0BZ, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Asthma Allergy. 2023 Sep 18;16:987-996. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S426227. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/JAA.S426227
PMID:37745901
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10516124/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High short-acting β-agonist (SABA) use and/or inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) underuse are common and are associated with poor asthma outcomes. This study explored patients' and healthcare practitioners' (HCPs') perspectives to contextualize asthma treatment patterns observed in real-world studies.

METHODS

Data were collected using online surveys from HCPs and people with asthma (≥18 years old with a confirmed asthma diagnosis of any severity) who had consented to research participation through the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

In total, 76 HCPs and 63 patients were invited to take part. Of 48 valid HCP responders, 54.2% (n=26) reported scheduling an annual asthma treatment review with their patients and 83.3% of general practitioners (n=40) had prescribed repeated inhalers at the patient's request. Of 47 valid patient responders, 57.4% (n=27) reported using their reliever (SABA) inhaler daily and 55.3% of patients (n=26) reported being prescribed a preventer inhaler. Of the total patient responders, 31.9% (n=15) reported that they never used their preventer inhaler. Consistent annual adherence with preventer inhalers was reported by 44.7% of all valid responders (n=21), while other patients admitted to using preventers intermittently.

CONCLUSION

SABA and ICS prescription patterns are driven by a combination of HCP and patient factors. Opportunities exist to improve asthma control and behaviours around inhaler use.

摘要

背景

短效β受体激动剂(SABA)使用频繁和/或吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)使用不足的情况很常见,且与哮喘不良预后相关。本研究探讨了患者和医疗从业者(HCP)的观点,以便将在现实世界研究中观察到的哮喘治疗模式置于具体情境中。

方法

通过在线调查收集来自HCP以及哮喘患者(年龄≥18岁,确诊为任何严重程度的哮喘)的数据,这些患者已通过临床实践研究数据链同意参与研究。使用描述性统计方法分析数据。

结果

总共邀请了76名HCP和63名患者参与。在48名有效的HCP受访者中,54.2%(n = 26)报告为其患者安排了年度哮喘治疗复查,83.3%的全科医生(n = 40)应患者要求开具了重复使用的吸入器。在47名有效的患者受访者中,57.4%(n = 27)报告每天使用缓解药物(SABA)吸入器,55.3%的患者(n = 26)报告被开具了预防性吸入器。在所有患者受访者中,31.9%(n = 15)报告他们从未使用过预防性吸入器。44.7%的所有有效受访者(n = 21)报告每年持续坚持使用预防性吸入器,而其他患者承认间歇性使用预防性药物。

结论

SABA和ICS的处方模式是由HCP和患者因素共同驱动的。存在改善哮喘控制和吸入器使用行为的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/575b/10516124/6c83c620de76/JAA-16-987-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/575b/10516124/6c83c620de76/JAA-16-987-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/575b/10516124/6c83c620de76/JAA-16-987-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Online Survey to Investigate Asthma Medication Prescription and Adherence from the Perspective of Patients and Healthcare Practitioners in England.关于从英格兰患者和医疗从业者角度调查哮喘药物处方及依从性的在线调查
J Asthma Allergy. 2023 Sep 18;16:987-996. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S426227. eCollection 2023.
2
General practitioners' views on the influence of cost on the prescribing of asthma preventer medicines: a qualitative study.全科医生对成本对哮喘预防药物处方影响的看法:一项定性研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2019 Jul;43(3):246-253. doi: 10.1071/AH17030.
3
Patients' and physicians' perspectives on the burden and management of asthma: Results from the APPaRENT 2 study.患者和医生对哮喘负担和管理的看法:来自 APPaRENT 2 研究的结果。
Respir Med. 2022 Sep;201:106948. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106948. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
4
Health and cost impact of stepping down asthma medication for UK patients, 2001-2017: A population-based observational study.2001-2017 年英国患者降低哮喘药物治疗的健康和成本影响:基于人群的观察性研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Jul 21;17(7):e1003145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003145. eCollection 2020 Jul.
5
Combination formoterol and budesonide as maintenance and reliever therapy versus current best practice (including inhaled steroid maintenance), for chronic asthma in adults and children.福莫特罗与布地奈德联合用于成人和儿童慢性哮喘的维持和缓解治疗与当前最佳实践(包括吸入性糖皮质激素维持治疗)的对比研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD007313. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007313.pub3.
6
Combination corticosteroid/β-agonist inhaler as reliever therapy: a solution for intermittent and mild asthma?联合皮质类固醇/β-激动剂吸入剂作为缓解治疗:间歇性和轻度哮喘的解决方案?
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Jan;133(1):39-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.10.053.
7
Systematic review and economic analysis of the comparative effectiveness of different inhaled corticosteroids and their usage with long-acting beta2 agonists for the treatment of chronic asthma in adults and children aged 12 years and over.不同吸入性糖皮质激素及其与长效β2受体激动剂联合使用治疗12岁及以上成人和儿童慢性哮喘比较效果的系统评价与经济学分析
Health Technol Assess. 2008 May;12(19):iii-iv, 1-360. doi: 10.3310/hta12190.
8
A Cross-Sectional Study on Prescription Patterns of Short-Acting β-Agonists in Patients with Asthma: Results from the SABINA III Colombia Cohort.一项关于哮喘患者短效β受体激动剂处方模式的横断面研究:来自哥伦比亚SABINA III队列的结果。
J Asthma Allergy. 2022 Aug 26;15:1167-1178. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S365009. eCollection 2022.
9
The Association Between Short-Acting β-Agonist Over-Prescription, and Patient-Reported Acquisition and Use on Asthma Control and Exacerbations: Data from Australia.短作用β激动剂处方过多与患者报告的哮喘控制和加重的获得和使用之间的关联:来自澳大利亚的数据。
Adv Ther. 2024 Mar;41(3):1262-1283. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02746-0. Epub 2024 Feb 4.
10
Short-acting beta-2 agonist prescription patterns and clinical outcomes in Chinese patients with asthma: an observational study in mainland China for the SABINA programme.中国哮喘患者中短效β2 受体激动剂的处方模式和临床结局:SABINA 计划在中国内地的观察性研究。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2022 Jan-Dec;16:17534666221115054. doi: 10.1177/17534666221115054.

引用本文的文献

1
The need for implementing a standardized, evidence-based emergency department discharge plan for optimizing adult asthma patient outcomes in the UAE, expert meeting report.阿联酋关于实施标准化、循证急诊科出院计划以优化成年哮喘患者治疗效果的需求,专家会议报告
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Nov 6;17(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00757-4.
2
Online Survey to Investigate Asthma Medication Prescription and Adherence from the Perspective of Patients and Healthcare Practitioners in England [Letter].关于从英格兰患者和医疗从业者角度调查哮喘药物处方及依从性的在线调查[信函]
J Asthma Allergy. 2023 Nov 14;16:1251-1252. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S447920. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Initiative for Asthma Strategy 2021: Executive Summary and Rationale for Key Changes.全球哮喘倡议策略 2021:执行摘要和关键变化的理由。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Jan;10(1S):S1-S18. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.10.001. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
2
Physician-Patient Concordance in the Assessment of Asthma Control.医患双方对哮喘控制评估的一致性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Aug;9(8):3080-3088.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.03.056. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
3
Over-prescription of short-acting beta agonists in the treatment of asthma.
哮喘治疗中短效 β 激动剂的过度处方
Fam Pract. 2021 Sep 25;38(5):612-616. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab013.
4
Treatment strategies for asthma: reshaping the concept of asthma management.哮喘的治疗策略:重塑哮喘管理理念
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020 Aug 15;16:75. doi: 10.1186/s13223-020-00472-8. eCollection 2020.
5
Overuse of short-acting β-agonists in asthma is associated with increased risk of exacerbation and mortality: a nationwide cohort study of the global SABINA programme.哮喘患者过度使用短效β受体激动剂与急性加重风险及死亡率增加相关:全球SABINA项目的一项全国性队列研究
Eur Respir J. 2020 Apr 16;55(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01872-2019. Print 2020 Apr.
6
Is it time to move away from short-acting beta-agonists in asthma management?是时候在哮喘管理中摒弃短效β受体激动剂了吗?
Eur Respir J. 2019 Apr 4;53(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.02223-2018. Print 2019 Apr.
7
Use of Symptoms Scores, Spirometry, and Other Pulmonary Function Testing for Asthma Monitoring.使用症状评分、肺量计及其他肺功能测试进行哮喘监测。
Front Pediatr. 2019 Mar 5;7:54. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00054. eCollection 2019.
8
Data resource profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum.数据资源简介:临床实践研究数据链(CPRD)奥鲁姆
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Dec 1;48(6):1740-1740g. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz034.
9
Regular follow-up visits reduce the risk for asthma exacerbation requiring admission in Korean adults with asthma.定期随访可降低韩国成年哮喘患者因哮喘急性加重而需住院治疗的风险。
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018 Jul 10;14:29. doi: 10.1186/s13223-018-0250-0. eCollection 2018.
10
The paradoxes of asthma management: time for a new approach?哮喘管理的悖论:是否需要新方法?
Eur Respir J. 2017 Sep 9;50(3). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01103-2017. Print 2017 Sep.