Dei Giudici Luca, Faini Andrea, Garro Luca, Tucciarone Agostino, Gigante Antonio
Clinical Orthopaedics, Department of Clinical and Molecular Science DISCLIMO, School of Medicine, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
II Orthopaedic Division, Istituto Chirurgico Ortopedico Traumatologico, ICOT, Latina, Italy.
EFORT Open Rev. 2017 Mar 13;1(9):325-331. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.160016. eCollection 2016 Sep.
The management of articular fractures is always a matter of concern. Each articular fracture is different from the other, whatever the classification system used and the surgical or non-surgical indications employed by the surgeon. The main goals remain anatomical reduction, stable fixation, loose body removal and minimal invasiveness.Open procedures are a compromise. Unfortunately, it is not always possible to meet every treatment goal perfectly, since associated lesions can pass unnoticed or delay treatment, and even in a 'best-case' scenario there can be complications in the long term.In the last few decades, arthroscopic joint surgery has undergone an exponential evolution, expanding its application in the trauma field with the development of arthroscopic and arthroscopically-assisted reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) techniques. The main advantages are an accurate diagnosis of the fracture and associated soft-tissue involvement, the potential for concomitant treatments, anatomical reduction and minimal invasiveness. ARIF techniques have been applied to treat fractures affecting several joints: shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee and ankle.The purpose of this paper is to provide a review of the most recent literature concerning arthroscopic and arthroscopically-assisted reduction and internal fixation for articular and peri-articular fractures of the upper limb, to analyse the results and suggest the best clinical applications.ARIF is an approach with excellent results in treating upper-limb articular and peri-articular fractures; it can be used in every joint and allows treatment of both the bony structure and soft-tissues.Post-operative outcomes are generally good or excellent. While under some circumstances ARIF is better than a conventional approach, the results are still beneficial due to the consistent range of movement recovery and shorter rehabilitation time.The main limitation of this technique is the steep learning curve, but investing in ARIF reduces intra-operative morbidity, surgical errors, operative times and costs. Cite this article: Dei Giudici L, Faini A, Garro L, Tucciarone A, Gigante A. Arthroscopic management of articular and peri-articular fractures of the upper limb. 2016;1:325-331. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.160016.
关节骨折的处理一直备受关注。无论采用何种分类系统以及外科医生所采用的手术或非手术指征,每例关节骨折都各不相同。主要目标仍然是解剖复位、稳定固定、清除游离体以及微创。开放手术是一种折衷方案。不幸的是,由于相关损伤可能未被察觉或延误治疗,而且即使在“最佳情况”下,长期也可能出现并发症,所以并非总是能够完美实现每一个治疗目标。在过去几十年中,关节镜手术经历了指数级发展,随着关节镜及关节镜辅助复位与内固定(ARIF)技术的发展,其在创伤领域的应用不断扩大。主要优点包括对骨折及相关软组织损伤的准确诊断、进行同期治疗的可能性、解剖复位以及微创。ARIF技术已应用于治疗累及多个关节的骨折:肩部、肘部、腕部、髋部、膝部和踝部。本文的目的是对有关上肢关节及关节周围骨折的关节镜及关节镜辅助复位与内固定的最新文献进行综述,分析结果并提出最佳临床应用建议。ARIF是一种治疗上肢关节及关节周围骨折效果极佳的方法;它可用于各个关节,能够同时治疗骨结构和软组织。术后结果通常良好或极佳。虽然在某些情况下ARIF比传统方法更好,但由于运动恢复范围一致且康复时间较短,其结果仍然有益。该技术的主要局限性是学习曲线较陡,但采用ARIF可降低术中发病率、手术失误、手术时间和成本。引用本文:Dei Giudici L, Faini A, Garro L, Tucciarone A, Gigante A. 上肢关节及关节周围骨折的关节镜治疗。2016;1:325 - 331. DOI: 10.1302/2058 - 5241.1.160016