Ifediora Chris Onyebuchi
School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
PeerJ. 2017 Apr 26;5:e3218. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3218. eCollection 2017.
The use of escorts (chauffeurs and chaperones) while on duty in after-hours-house-call (AHHC) is one key protective option available to doctors in the service, and has been linked to low burnout and increased satisfaction in AHHC. This study aims to explore the patterns of engagement of escorts in Australian AHHC.
This is a questionnaire-based, electronic survey of all 300 doctors involved in AHHC through the National Home Doctor Service (NHDS), Australia's largest providers of the service. The survey explored the doctor's experiences over the 12-month period from October 2013 to September 2014.
This survey received a total of 168 valid responses, giving a response rate of 56%. Nearly 61% of the doctors involved in AHHC engaged escorts (chauffeurs and chaperones). Of those doctors that engage chauffeurs, three-quarters do so "all or most times", while only one-quarter engaged chaperones to the same degree of frequency. Hiring escorts is very popular among Brisbane (91.7%) and Sydney-based (88.2%) practitioners, but is unpopular in the City of Gold Coast (26.1%). There were moderate patronages in Adelaide (52.9%) and Melbourne Area (46.4%). Compared to males, females were less likely to drive themselves without escorts (OR 0.20; < 0.01; CI [0.07-0.57]), but more likely to engage chauffeurs (OR 5.87; = 0.03; CI [1.16-29.77]). Practitioners who were apprehensive were three times more likely to either engage escorts as chauffeurs (OR 3.10; = 0.04; CI [1.05-9.15]) or as an accompanying chaperone if they self-drive (OR 3.03; = 0.02; CI [1.16-7.89]).
More needs to be done to increase the engagement of escorts by doctors involved in the Australian AHHC, particularly given their proven benefits in the service. Future studies may be needed to fully explore the real reasons behind the significant associations identified in this study.
在非工作时间上门出诊(AHHC)时使用护送人员(司机和陪护人员)是该服务中医生可采用的一项关键保护措施,且与AHHC中较低的职业倦怠率和更高的满意度相关。本研究旨在探究澳大利亚AHHC中护送人员的使用模式。
这是一项基于问卷调查的电子调查,对象为通过澳大利亚最大的上门出诊服务提供商国家上门医生服务机构(NHDS)参与AHHC的所有300名医生。该调查探究了医生在2013年10月至2014年9月这12个月期间的经历。
本次调查共收到168份有效回复,回复率为56%。参与AHHC的医生中近61%使用护送人员(司机和陪护人员)。在那些雇佣司机的医生中,四分之三的人“全部或大部分时间”如此,而只有四分之一的人以相同频率雇佣陪护人员。雇佣护送人员在布里斯班(91.7%)和悉尼地区(88.2%)的从业者中非常普遍,但在黄金海岸市(26.1%)不受欢迎。在阿德莱德(52.9%)和墨尔本地区(46.4%)有一定的使用率。与男性相比,女性在没有护送人员的情况下自己开车的可能性较小(比值比0.20;<0.01;可信区间[0.07 - 0.57]),但雇佣司机的可能性更大(比值比5.87;=0.03;可信区间[1.16 - 29.77])。有担忧情绪的从业者雇佣司机作为护送人员的可能性是其他人的三倍(比值比3.10;=0.04;可信区间[1.05 - 9.15]),或者如果他们自己开车,雇佣陪护人员作为护送人员的可能性是其他人的三倍(比值比3.03;=0.02;可信区间[1.16 - 7.89])。
需要做更多工作来提高参与澳大利亚AHHC的医生对护送人员的使用率,特别是考虑到其在该服务中已被证实的益处。未来可能需要进行更多研究,以充分探究本研究中所确定的显著关联背后的真正原因。