1 Department of Orthopaedics, Erasmus MC , Rotterdam, The Netherlands .
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC , Rotterdam, The Netherlands .
Tissue Eng Part A. 2018 Feb;24(3-4):207-218. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2016.0537. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
Currently, autografts still represent the gold standard treatment for the repair of large bone defects. However, these are associated with donor-site morbidity and increased pain, cost, and recovery time. The ideal therapy would use biomaterials combined with bone growth factors to induce and instruct bone defect repair without the need to harvest patient tissue. In this line, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) have been the most extensively used agents for clinical bone repair, but at supraphysiological doses that are not without risk. Because of the need to eliminate the risks of BMP2 use in vivo, we assessed the ability of three putative osteogenic factors, nel-like molecule type 1 (NELL-1), high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), and CCN2, to enhance the essential processes for bone defect repair in vitro and compared them to BMP2. Although it has been reported that NELL-1, HMGB1, and CCN2 play a role in bone formation, less is known about the contribution of these proteins to the different events involved, such as cell migration, osteogenesis, and vasculogenesis. In this study, we investigated the effects of different doses of NELL-1, HMGB, CCN2, and BMP2 on these three processes as a model for the recruitment and differentiation of resident cells in the in vivo bone defect repair situation, using cells of human origin. Our data demonstrated that NELL-1, HMGB1, and CCN2 significantly induced mesenchymal stem cell migration (from 1.58-fold increase compared to control), but BMP2 did not. Interestingly, only BMP2 increased osteogenesis in marrow stromal cells, whereas it inhibited osteogenesis in preosteoblasts. Moreover, the four proteins studied promoted significantly endothelial cell migration, reaching a maximum of 2.4-fold increase compared to control, and induced formation of tube-like structures. NELL-1, HMGB1, and CCN2 had these effects at relatively low doses compared to BMP2. This work indicates that NELL-1, HMGB1, and CCN2 might enhance bone defect healing via the recruitment of endogenous cells and induction of vascularization and act via different processes than BMP2.
目前,自体移植物仍然是修复大骨缺损的金标准治疗方法。然而,这些方法与供体部位的发病率增加、疼痛、成本和恢复时间增加有关。理想的治疗方法是使用生物材料结合骨生长因子来诱导和指导骨缺损修复,而无需采集患者组织。在这方面,骨形态发生蛋白(BMPs)是最广泛用于临床骨修复的药物,但在超生理剂量下使用并非没有风险。由于需要消除 BMP2 在体内使用的风险,我们评估了三种潜在的成骨因子,即神经调节素样分子 1(NELL-1)、高迁移率族蛋白 1(HMGB1)和 CCN2,在体外增强骨缺损修复的基本过程的能力,并将其与 BMP2 进行了比较。虽然已经报道 NELL-1、HMGB1 和 CCN2 在骨形成中发挥作用,但人们对这些蛋白对不同事件的贡献知之甚少,例如细胞迁移、成骨和血管生成。在这项研究中,我们研究了不同剂量的 NELL-1、HMGB、CCN2 和 BMP2 对这三个过程的影响,作为体内骨缺损修复情况下募集和分化固有细胞的模型,使用人类来源的细胞。我们的数据表明,NELL-1、HMGB1 和 CCN2 显著诱导间充质干细胞迁移(与对照组相比增加 1.58 倍),但 BMP2 没有。有趣的是,只有 BMP2 增加骨髓基质细胞的成骨作用,而抑制成骨前体细胞的成骨作用。此外,研究的四种蛋白显著促进内皮细胞迁移,与对照组相比最大增加 2.4 倍,并诱导管状结构的形成。与 BMP2 相比,NELL-1、HMGB1 和 CCN2 在相对较低的剂量下具有这些作用。这项工作表明,NELL-1、HMGB1 和 CCN2 可能通过募集内源性细胞并诱导血管生成来增强骨缺损愈合,并通过与 BMP2 不同的过程发挥作用。