Gao Ying, Silvennoinen Mika, Pesola Arto J, Kainulainen Heikki, Cronin Neil J, Finni Taija
Neuromuscular Research Center, Biology of Physical Activity, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, FINLAND.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Sep;49(9):1927-1934. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001305.
While merely standing up interrupts sedentary behavior, it is important to study acute metabolic responses during single bouts of sitting and standing to understand the physiological processes affecting the health of office workers.
Eighteen healthy middle-age women 49.4 ± 7.9 yr old (range: 40-64) with a body mass index of 23.4 ± 2.8 kg·m volunteered for this laboratory-based randomized crossover trial where they performed 2 h desk work in either sitting or standing postures after overnight fasting. Muscle activity (normalized to walking at 5 km·h), respiratory gas exchange, and blood samples were assessed after glucose loading (75 g).
Compared with seated work, continuous standing resulted in greater activity in the thigh muscles (mean of biceps femoris and vastus lateralis: 17% ± 8% vs 7% ± 2%, P < 0.001) and leg muscles (mean of tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius medialis, and soleus: 16% ± 6% vs 7% ± 3%, P < 0.001), but no increases in back muscle activity (thoracic erector spinae, lumbar erector spinae, and multifidus). Concomitant with 9% higher energy expenditure (EE) (P = 0.002), standing resulted in higher fat oxidation (48% ± 9% EE vs 39% ± 7% EE, P = 0.008) and lower carbohydrate oxidation (52% ± 9% EE vs 61% ± 7% EE, P = 0.008) than sitting. Glucose total and net incremental area under the curve were approximately 10% (P = 0.026) and 42% (P = 0.017) higher during standing than sitting, respectively. Insulin concentration did not differ between conditions.
Compared with sitting, 2 h of standing increased muscle activity, fat oxidation, and circulating glucose level. These results suggest fuel switching in favor of fat oxidation during standing despite extra carbohydrate availability.
虽然仅仅站起来就能打断久坐行为,但研究单次坐立期间的急性代谢反应对于理解影响办公室职员健康的生理过程很重要。
18名健康的中年女性,年龄49.4±7.9岁(范围:40 - 64岁),体重指数为23.4±2.8kg·m²,自愿参加这项基于实验室的随机交叉试验。她们在过夜禁食后,以坐姿或站姿进行2小时的伏案工作。在口服葡萄糖(75g)后,评估肌肉活动(以5km·h步行时的活动为标准进行归一化)、呼吸气体交换和血液样本。
与坐姿工作相比,持续站立导致大腿肌肉(股二头肌和股外侧肌平均值:17%±8%对7%±2%,P<0.001)和腿部肌肉(胫骨前肌、腓肠肌内侧头和比目鱼肌平均值:16%±6%对7%±3%,P<0.001)的活动增加,但背部肌肉(胸段竖脊肌、腰段竖脊肌和多裂肌)活动没有增加。与能量消耗(EE)高出9%(P = 0.002)相伴,站立比坐着导致更高的脂肪氧化(48%±9%EE对39%±7%EE,P = 0.008)和更低的碳水化合物氧化(52%±9%EE对61%±7%EE,P = 0.008)。站立期间葡萄糖曲线下总面积和净增加面积分别比坐着时高出约10%(P = 0.026)和42%(P = 0.017)。不同条件下胰岛素浓度没有差异。
与坐着相比,站立2小时增加了肌肉活动、脂肪氧化和循环葡萄糖水平。这些结果表明,尽管有额外的碳水化合物供应,但站立期间有利于脂肪氧化的燃料转换。