Gwam Chukwuweike U, Mistry Jaydev B, Richards Ifie V, Patel Dhrudeep, Patel Nirav G, Thomas Melbin, Adamu Hephzibah, Delanois Ronald E
Center for Joint Preservation and Replacement, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland.
J Knee Surg. 2018 Feb;31(2):184-188. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1602131. Epub 2017 May 2.
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be associated with substantial postoperative pain that may affect satisfaction and return to function. Various forms of pain control have been used; however, multimodal periarticular analgesia (MPA) and adductor canal block (ACB) have recently gained popularity. The purpose of this study was to compare (1) discharge status, (2) pain levels, (3) postoperative opioid consumption, and (4) length of stay (LOS) between TKA patients who received MPA only and those who received both MPA and ACB. A single surgeon database was reviewed for TKA patients who received MPA with or without ACB between January 2015 and April 2016. This yielded 110 patients who had a mean age of 62 years. Forty-five patients received MPA alone, while 65 patients received both modalities. Patient records were reviewed to obtain demographic and end-point data (discharge status, pain scores, opioid consumption, and LOS). Student's -test and chi-squared test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. There was no significant difference in discharge status ( = 0.304), pain levels ( = 0.343), and postoperative opioid consumption ( = 0.729) between the two cohorts. When compared with MPA patients, TKA patients who received both MPA and ACB demonstrated shorter LOS (2.44 vs. 1.98 days), a value that trended toward significance ( = 0.061). When comparing TKA patients who received MPA with those who received a combination of MPA and ACB, we were unable to elucidate a significant difference in any of the end points of interest. Therefore, MPA alone is comparable to combined MPA and ACB in managing postoperative pain in TKA patients. However, larger studies may be necessary to verify these findings.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)可能会伴有严重的术后疼痛,这可能会影响患者满意度和功能恢复。人们已经采用了多种疼痛控制方式;然而,多模式关节周围镇痛(MPA)和收肌管阻滞(ACB)最近越来越受欢迎。本研究的目的是比较仅接受MPA的TKA患者与接受MPA和ACB两者的患者之间的(1)出院状态、(2)疼痛程度、(3)术后阿片类药物消耗量和(4)住院时间(LOS)。回顾了一位外科医生的数据库中在2015年1月至2016年4月期间接受了有或没有ACB的MPA的TKA患者。这产生了110名平均年龄为62岁的患者。45名患者仅接受MPA,而65名患者接受了两种方式。查阅患者记录以获取人口统计学和终点数据(出院状态、疼痛评分、阿片类药物消耗量和住院时间)。分别使用学生t检验和卡方检验来比较连续变量和分类变量。两组之间在出院状态(P = 0.304)、疼痛程度(P = 0.343)和术后阿片类药物消耗量(P = 0.729)方面没有显著差异。与仅接受MPA的患者相比,接受MPA和ACB两者的TKA患者住院时间更短(2.44天对1.98天),该值有显著差异的趋势(P = 0.061)。在比较接受MPA的TKA患者与接受MPA和ACB联合治疗的患者时,我们无法阐明在任何感兴趣的终点方面存在显著差异。因此,仅MPA在管理TKA患者术后疼痛方面与MPA和ACB联合治疗相当。然而,可能需要更大规模的研究来验证这些发现。