Hilal George, Reitzel Ruth, Al Hamal Zainab, Chaftari Anne-Marie, Al Wohoush Iba, Jiang Ying, Hachem Ray, Raad Issam I
Cancer and Metabolism Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Campus of Medical Sciences, Saint-Joseph University, Riad el Solh, Beirut, Lebanon.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 May 3;12(5):e0174266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174266. eCollection 2017.
The activity levels of telomerase and its mRNA have been found to be more diagnostically sensitive than cytological results in many cancerous tissues and correlate well with the clinical disease stage. Currently, there are several methods of detecting telomerase in tissues and in blood. The most commonly used method is a conventional quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) which is time and labor exhausting.
We have developed a simple and innovative blood test method that allows us to diagnose cancer and relapsed cancer in a cost- and time -effective manner. We had evaluated our novel method in two populations: 1) in vivo in three mice with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) versus one control mouse and 2) clinically in 30 cancer patients versus 10 individuals without cancer. We compared our novel method with the old conventional method. At least one sample was obtained from each patient included in the study.
The novel method substantially increased the sensitivity (from 37% to 77%, p<0.001) and negative predictive value (from 32% to 56%, p = 0.005) of the telomerase test for all cancer patients (those who were substantially treated and those who were not). There was no significant difference in telomerase activity between cancer patients and healthy volunteers using the conventional method (p = 0.13), whereas there was a significant difference using the novel method (p = 0.001).
Conventional method shows no significant difference in telomerase activity between cancer patients and healthy volunteers (p = 0.13), whereas there was a significant difference using the novel method (p = 0.001).
在许多癌组织中,已发现端粒酶及其mRNA的活性水平在诊断上比细胞学结果更敏感,并且与临床疾病分期密切相关。目前,有几种在组织和血液中检测端粒酶的方法。最常用的方法是传统的定量实时聚合酶链反应(PCR),这种方法既耗时又费力。
我们开发了一种简单且创新的血液检测方法,该方法能让我们以经济高效且节省时间的方式诊断癌症及复发性癌症。我们在两组人群中评估了我们的新方法:1)在三只患有胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的小鼠体内与一只对照小鼠进行对比;2)在临床上对30名癌症患者与10名非癌症个体进行对比。我们将我们的新方法与旧的传统方法进行了比较。研究纳入的每位患者至少采集了一份样本。
对于所有癌症患者(包括接受大量治疗的患者和未接受大量治疗的患者),新方法显著提高了端粒酶检测的灵敏度(从37%提高到77%,p<0.001)和阴性预测值(从32%提高到56%,p = 0.005)。使用传统方法时,癌症患者与健康志愿者之间的端粒酶活性无显著差异(p = 0.13),而使用新方法时则存在显著差异(p = 0.001)。
传统方法显示癌症患者与健康志愿者之间的端粒酶活性无显著差异(p = 0.13),而使用新方法时则存在显著差异(p = 0.001)。