• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[评估肺腺癌患者肿瘤细胞经气腔播散的临床病理特征及预后]

[To evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcome of tumor cells spreading through air spaces in patients with adenocarcinoma of lung].

作者信息

Sun P L, Liu J N, Cao L Q, Yao M, Gao H W

机构信息

Department of Pathology, the Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2017 May 8;46(5):303-308. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2017.05.004.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2017.05.004
PMID:28468034
Abstract

To investigate the clinicopathologic features, molecular characteristics and prognosis of spread through air space (STAS) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung. Two hundred and eighty-eight lung adenocarcinoma patients with complete clinicopathologic and follow-up data were included. The patients were divided into STAS positive (178 cases) and negative (110 cases) groups.EGFR and KRAS gene mutations were detected by amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS), and ALK and ROS1 gene fusion were detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization method. The relationship between STAS and clinicopathologic, molecular features, and patient outcome was analyzed. STAS was present in 61.8%(178/288) of lung adenocarcinomas. The positive rate of STAS in tumors >3 cm was significantly higher than that in tumors ≤3 cm (=0.009), and was significantly higher in tumors with pleural invasion (<0.01), venous invasion (<0.01), lymphatic invasion (<0.01), perineural invasion (=0.029) and tumors with necrosis (<0.01). STAS was also correlated with tumor recurrence (<0.01) and advanced pathologic TNM stage (=0.002). There was no significant correlation with patients' gender, age and smoking history. Histologically, STAS was present in 58.0%(91/157), 67.6%(50/74), 2/6, 64.3%(27/42) and 8/9 of acinar, papillary, lepidic, solid and micropapillary adenocarcinomas, respectively. In addition, the positive rates of STAS in tumor with micropapillary (>5%) and without micropapillary pattern were 80.9%(55/68) and 55.9%(123/220), respectively (<0.01). STAS was significantly higher in EGFR negative group (=0.034), ALK gene rearrangement group (=0.003) and ROS1 gene rearrangement group (=0.012), but there was no significant correlation with KRAS mutation. Univariate survival analysis showed that patients with STAS had a shorter progression-free survival (PFS, <0.01) and overall survival (=0.013). Multivariate analysis confirmed that STAS was an independent predictor of PFS in lung adenocarcinoma patients (: 2.749, 95%: 1.550-4.876, =0.001). The presence of STAS in lung adenocarcinoma suggests high risk of recurrence and invasion and is thus an important prognostic factor. In addition, STAS is associated with EGFR mutation, ALK and ROS1 gene rearrangement.

摘要

探讨肺腺癌患者气腔播散(STAS)的临床病理特征、分子特征及预后。纳入288例具有完整临床病理及随访资料的肺腺癌患者。将患者分为STAS阳性组(178例)和阴性组(110例)。采用扩增阻滞突变系统(ARMS)检测EGFR和KRAS基因突变,采用荧光原位杂交法检测ALK和ROS1基因融合。分析STAS与临床病理、分子特征及患者预后的关系。61.8%(178/288)的肺腺癌存在STAS。肿瘤>3 cm的STAS阳性率显著高于肿瘤≤3 cm的(=0.009),且在有胸膜侵犯(<0.01)、静脉侵犯(<0.01)、淋巴侵犯(<0.01)、神经侵犯(=0.029)及有坏死的肿瘤(<0.01)中显著更高。STAS还与肿瘤复发(<0.01)及高级别病理TNM分期(=0.002)相关。与患者的性别、年龄及吸烟史无显著相关性。组织学上,腺泡状、乳头状、贴壁状、实体状及微乳头状腺癌中STAS的存在率分别为58.0%(91/157)、67.6%(50/74)、2/6、64.3%(27/42)及8/9。此外,有微乳头(>5%)和无微乳头模式的肿瘤中STAS阳性率分别为80.9%(55/68)和55.9%(123/220)(<0.01)。EGFR阴性组(=0.034)、ALK基因重排组(=0.003)及ROS1基因重排组中STAS显著更高,但与KRAS突变无显著相关性。单因素生存分析显示,STAS患者的无进展生存期(PFS,<0.01)和总生存期(=0.013)较短。多因素分析证实,STAS是肺腺癌患者PFS的独立预测因素(:2.749,95%:1.550 - 4.876,=0.001)。肺腺癌中STAS的存在提示复发和侵袭风险高,因此是一个重要的预后因素。此外,STAS与EGFR突变、ALK和ROS1基因重排相关。

相似文献

1
[To evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcome of tumor cells spreading through air spaces in patients with adenocarcinoma of lung].[评估肺腺癌患者肿瘤细胞经气腔播散的临床病理特征及预后]
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2017 May 8;46(5):303-308. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2017.05.004.
2
[Correlation of clinicopathologic features and driver gene mutation in non-small cell lung cancer].非小细胞肺癌临床病理特征与驱动基因突变的相关性
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Apr 8;45(4):221-5. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5807.2016.04.002.
3
ALK, ROS1 and RET fusions in 1139 lung adenocarcinomas: a comprehensive study of common and fusion pattern-specific clinicopathologic, histologic and cytologic features.ALK、ROS1 和 RET 融合在 1139 例肺腺癌中的综合研究:常见和融合模式特异性临床病理、组织学和细胞学特征。
Lung Cancer. 2014 May;84(2):121-6. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.02.007. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
4
The frequency and impact of ROS1 rearrangement on clinical outcomes in never smokers with lung adenocarcinoma.ROS1 重排对从不吸烟的肺腺癌患者临床结局的频率和影响。
Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep;24(9):2364-70. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt220. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
5
Clinical and prognostic implications of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements in never-smokers with surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma.ALK 和 ROS1 重排在手术切除的非吸烟肺腺癌患者中的临床和预后意义。
Lung Cancer. 2014 Mar;83(3):389-95. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
6
Identification of EGFR mutation, KRAS mutation, and ALK gene rearrangement in cytological specimens of primary and metastatic lung adenocarcinoma.在原发性和转移性肺腺癌的细胞学标本中鉴定 EGFR 突变、KRAS 突变和 ALK 基因重排。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2013 Sep;121(9):500-7. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21288. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
7
Mutational Profile and New IASLC/ATS/ERS Classification Provide Additional Prognostic Information about Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Study of 125 Patients from Brazil.突变谱与新的国际肺癌研究协会/美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会分类为肺腺癌提供了额外的预后信息:一项对125例巴西患者的研究。
Oncology. 2015;89(3):175-86. doi: 10.1159/000376552. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
8
Clinical characteristics associated with ALK rearrangements in never-smokers with pulmonary adenocarcinoma.与从不吸烟的肺腺癌患者中 ALK 重排相关的临床特征。
Lung Cancer. 2014 Feb;83(2):259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
9
Comprehensive analysis of spread through air spaces in lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma using the 8th edition AJCC/UICC staging system.肺腺癌和鳞癌中空气传播途径的全面分析,采用第 8 版 AJCC/UICC 分期系统。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jul 29;20(1):705. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07200-w.
10
[Analysis of Clinicopathological Features on Spread Through Air Spaces
of Lung Adenocarcinoma].[肺腺癌气腔播散的临床病理特征分析]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2023 Sep 20;26(9):650-658. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2023.106.18.

引用本文的文献

1
[Analysis of Clinicopathological Features on Spread Through Air Spaces
of Lung Adenocarcinoma].[肺腺癌气腔播散的临床病理特征分析]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2023 Sep 20;26(9):650-658. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2023.106.18.
2
The More Extensive the Spread through Air Spaces, the Worse the Prognosis Is: Semi-Quantitative Evaluation of Spread through Air Spaces in Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas.空气空间播散越广泛,预后越差:肺腺癌空气空间播散的半定量评估。
Pathobiology. 2023;90(2):104-113. doi: 10.1159/000525456. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
3
[Research Progress on Spread Through Air Spaces of Lung Cancer].
[肺癌在肺实质内播散的研究进展]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2022 Jan 20;25(1):54-60. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2021.101.49. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
4
Radiomics nomograms of tumors and peritumoral regions for the preoperative prediction of spread through air spaces in lung adenocarcinoma.用于术前预测肺腺癌气腔播散的肿瘤及瘤周区域的影像组学列线图。
Transl Oncol. 2020 Oct;13(10):100820. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2020.100820. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
5
Three-Dimensional Histologic, Immunohistochemical, and Multiplex Immunofluorescence Analyses of Dynamic Vessel Co-Option of Spread Through Air Spaces in Lung Adenocarcinoma.三维组织学、免疫组织化学和多重免疫荧光分析肺腺癌中空气传播途径中血管共选择的动态变化。
J Thorac Oncol. 2020 Apr;15(4):589-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.12.112. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
6
[Progress on the Study of Tumor Spread Through Air Spaces in the Clinicopathological Characteristics of Lung Adenocarcinoma and Its Influence on the Surgical Treatment and Prognosis of Lung Cancer].[肿瘤经气腔播散在肺腺癌临床病理特征中的研究进展及其对肺癌外科治疗和预后的影响]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2019 Jun 20;22(6):363-368. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2019.06.06.