Suppr超能文献

上矢状窦上方融合矢状缝的开颅手术是一种安全的手术。

Craniotomy of the Fused Sagittal Suture Over the Superior Sagittal Sinus Is a Safe Procedure.

作者信息

Kölby David, Fischer Sara, Arab Khalid, Maltese Giovanni, Olsson Robert, Paganini Anna, Tarnow Peter, Kölby Lars

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

J Craniofac Surg. 2017 May;28(3):650-653. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003440.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Spring-assisted cranioplasty to correct sagittal synostosis is based on midline craniotomy through the closed sagittal suture, over the superior sagittal sinus (SSS). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the perioperative safety of this technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of all patients operated with median craniotomy and springs from 1998 to the end of 2015. For comparison, all Pi-plasties performed during the same time interval were also evaluated. The safety measures were evaluated based on incidence of damage to SSS, incidence of dural tears, perioperative blood loss, operative time, and hospital stay.

RESULTS

In the group that had undergone midline craniotomy combined with springs (n = 225), 4 perioperative damages to SSS and 1 dural tear were seen. The perioperative blood loss was 62.8 ± 65.3 mL (mean ± standard deviation). The operative time was 67.9 ± 21.5 minutes and the hospital stay was 4.8 ± 1.1 days. In the group that had undergone pi-plasty (n = 105), no damages to SSS but 3 dural tears were seen. The perioperative blood loss was 352.8 ± 174.4 mL. The operative time was 126.0 ± 31.7 minutes and the hospital stay was 7.1 ± 1.4 days.

CONCLUSION

Craniotomy SSS in sagittal synostosis is a safe procedure with low morbidity in terms of damage to the SSS. Midline craniotomy combined with springs has significantly lower preoperative blood loss, operative time, and hospital stay (P < 0.001 for all) compared to pi-plasty.

摘要

引言

弹簧辅助颅骨成形术用于矫正矢状缝早闭,其基于通过闭合矢状缝、在上矢状窦(SSS)上方进行的中线开颅术。本研究的目的是评估该技术的围手术期安全性。

材料与方法

这是一项对1998年至2015年底接受中线开颅术及使用弹簧治疗的所有患者的回顾性研究。为作比较,同时段内所有行Pi成形术的患者也进行了评估。基于上矢状窦损伤发生率、硬脑膜撕裂发生率、围手术期失血量、手术时间和住院时间来评估安全指标。

结果

在接受中线开颅术联合弹簧治疗的组(n = 225)中,观察到4例围手术期上矢状窦损伤和1例硬脑膜撕裂。围手术期失血量为62.8±65.3毫升(均值±标准差)。手术时间为67.9±21.5分钟,住院时间为4.8±1.1天。在接受Pi成形术的组(n = 105)中,未观察到上矢状窦损伤,但有3例硬脑膜撕裂。围手术期失血量为352.8±174.4毫升。手术时间为126.0±31.7分钟,住院时间为7.1±1.4天。

结论

矢状缝早闭的中线开颅术在上矢状窦损伤方面是一种安全的手术,发病率较低。与Pi成形术相比,中线开颅术联合弹簧治疗的术前失血量、手术时间和住院时间显著更低(所有P值均<0.001)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验