Suppr超能文献

残留森林生物质流化床燃烧产生的灰烬:作为一种可行的管理选择回用于土壤。

Ashes from fluidized bed combustion of residual forest biomass: recycling to soil as a viable management option.

作者信息

Cruz Nuno C, Rodrigues Sónia M, Carvalho Lina, Duarte Armando C, Pereira Eduarda, Römkens Paul F A M, Tarelho Luís A C

机构信息

CESAM & Department of Chemistry, University of Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.

LCA-Central Laboratory of Analysis, University of Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Jun;24(17):14770-14781. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9013-6. Epub 2017 May 3.

Abstract

Although bottom ash (BA) [or mixtures of bottom and fly ash (FA)] from clean biomass fuels is currently used as liming agent, additive for compost, and fertilizer on agricultural and forest soils in certain European countries, in several other countries most of the ashes are currently disposed in landfills. This is due to both a lack of a proper classification of the materials and of regulatory barriers.Chemical characterization including analysis of an array of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) proved that over 100,000 tons of BA currently landfilled every year in Portugal actually complied with legal limits for PTEs for soil fertilizers applied in other countries. Pot experiments were conducted, testing three dosages of BA and FA (1, 2.5, and 5%, in weight) in three mining soils with different properties. Additions of ash materials to soils led to an increase in the pore water pH relative to control pots (0% of ash added) and had a clear impact on DOC and on the solubilization of both macro- and micronutrients (notably Cu).The results from the case study using BA and FA from a Portuguese biomass thermal power plant demonstrate that it is imperative to further develop a regulatory framework to alleviate technological and environmental barriers for biomass ash utilization as raw material for fertilizers and/or soil liming agent, in accordance with the goals of the circular economy. A more harmonized view on how to assess the merits and risks of the re-use of these materials is also needed.

摘要

尽管来自清洁生物质燃料的底灰(BA)[或底灰与飞灰(FA)的混合物]目前在某些欧洲国家被用作农业和森林土壤的石灰改良剂、堆肥添加剂和肥料,但在其他一些国家,大部分灰烬目前都被填埋处理。这既是由于缺乏对这些材料的适当分类,也是由于监管障碍。包括对一系列潜在有毒元素(PTEs)进行分析的化学表征证明,葡萄牙每年目前填埋的超过10万吨底灰实际上符合其他国家土壤肥料中PTEs的法定限值。进行了盆栽试验,在三种性质不同的矿质土壤中测试了三种剂量的底灰和飞灰(重量分别为1%、2.5%和5%)。向土壤中添加灰分物质导致孔隙水pH值相对于对照盆(添加0%灰分)有所增加,并对溶解有机碳以及大量和微量养分(特别是铜)的溶解有明显影响。使用葡萄牙生物质热电厂的底灰和飞灰进行的案例研究结果表明,根据循环经济的目标,必须进一步制定监管框架,以消除生物质灰作为肥料和/或土壤石灰改良剂原料利用的技术和环境障碍。还需要对如何评估这些材料再利用的优点和风险形成更统一的看法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验