• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助肾肿物单纯剜除术的疗效:欧洲单一中心经验

Outcomes of robot-assisted simple enucleation of renal masses: A single European center experience.

作者信息

Matei Deliu Victor, Vartolomei Mihai Dorin, Musi Gennaro, Renne Giuseppe, Tringali Valeria Maria Lucia, Mistretta Francesco Alessandro, Delor Maurizio, Russo Andrea, Cioffi Antonio, Bianchi Roberto, Cozzi Gabriele, Di Trapani Ettore, Bottero Danilo, Cordima Giovanni, Lucarelli Giuseppe, Ferro Matteo, de Cobelli Ottavio

机构信息

Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy Department of Urology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy 'Iuliu Hatieganu' Cluj-Napoca Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Targu Mures, Romania Department of Laboratory and Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy University of Milan, Milan Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 May;96(18):e6771. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006771.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000006771
PMID:28471972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5419918/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the ability of pre-and intraoperative parameters, to predict the risk of perioperative complications after robot-assisted laparoscopic simple enucleation (RASE) of renal masses, and to evaluate the rate of trifecta achievement of this approach stratifying the cohort according to the use of ischemia during the enucleation.From April 2009 to June 2016, 129 patients underwent RASE at our Institution. We stratified the procedures in 2 groups: clamping and clamp-less RASE. After RASE, all specimens were retrospectively reviewed to assess the surface-intermediate-base (SIB) scoring system. Patients were followed-up according to the European Association of Urology guidelines recommendations. All pre-, intra-, and postoperative outcomes were prospectively collected in a customized database and retrospectively analyzed.A total of 112 (86.8%) patients underwent a pure RASE and 17 (13.2%) had a hybrid according to SIB classification system. The mean age was 61.17 years. In 21 patients (16.3%), complications occurred, 13 (61.9%) were Clavien 1 and 2, while 8 were Clavien 3a and b complications. Statistical significant association with complications was found in patients with American Society of Anestesiology (ASA) score 3 (44.5%, P = .04), longer mean operative time (OT) 195 versus 161.36 minutes (P =.03), mean postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) 10.1 versus 11.8 (P <.001), and mean ΔHb 3.59 versus 2.18 (P <.001). In multivariate logistic regression, only longer OT and ΔHb were statistical significant predictive factors for complications. In sub-group analysis, clamp-less RASE was safe in terms of complications (14.1%), positive surgical margins (1.3%), and mid-term local recurrence (1.3%). Although in this approach there is higher EBL (P = .01), this had no impact on ΔHb (P = .28). A clamp-less approach was associated with a higher rate of SIB 0 (71.8% vs 51%, P = .02), higher trifecta achievement (84.6% vs 62.7%, P = .004), and better impact on serum creatinine (mean 0.83 vs 0.91, P = .01).RASE of renal tumors is a safe technique with very good postoperative outcomes. Complication rate is low and associated with ASA score >3, longer OT, and ΔHb. RASE is suitable for the clamp-less approach, which allows to perform easier the pure enucleation (SIB 0) and to obtain higher rates of trifecta outcomes.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估术前和术中参数预测肾肿物机器人辅助腹腔镜单纯剜除术(RASE)后围手术期并发症风险的能力,并根据剜除术中是否使用缺血技术对队列进行分层,评估该方法的三联成功(trifecta)率。2009年4月至2016年6月,129例患者在我院接受了RASE。我们将手术分为两组:夹闭式和非夹闭式RASE。RASE术后,对所有标本进行回顾性评估,以评估表面-中间-基底(SIB)评分系统。根据欧洲泌尿外科学会指南建议对患者进行随访。所有术前、术中和术后结果均前瞻性收集到定制数据库中,并进行回顾性分析。根据SIB分类系统,共有112例(86.8%)患者接受了单纯RASE,17例(13.2%)为混合式。平均年龄为61.17岁。21例(16.3%)患者发生并发症,13例(61.9%)为Clavien 1和2级,8例为Clavien 3a和b级并发症。美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分3分的患者(44.5%,P = 0.04)、平均手术时间较长(OT)195分钟对161.36分钟(P = 0.03)、术后平均血红蛋白(Hb)10.1对11.8(P < 0.001)以及平均血红蛋白下降量(ΔHb)3.59对2.18(P < 0.001)与并发症有统计学显著相关性。在多因素逻辑回归分析中,只有较长的OT和ΔHb是并发症的统计学显著预测因素。在亚组分析中,非夹闭式RASE在并发症(14.1%)、手术切缘阳性(1.3%)和中期局部复发(1.3%)方面是安全的。尽管这种方法的术中出血量(EBL)较高(P = 0.01),但对ΔHb没有影响(P = 0.28)。非夹闭式方法与较高的SIB 0率(71.8%对51%,P = 0.02)、较高的三联成功(trifecta)率(84.6%对62.7%,P = 0.004)以及对血清肌酐的更好影响(平均0.83对0.91,P = 0.01)相关。肾肿瘤的RASE是一种安全的技术,术后效果非常好。并发症发生率低,与ASA评分>3、较长的OT和ΔHb相关。RASE适用于非夹闭式方法,该方法能更轻松地进行单纯剜除术(SIB 0)并获得更高的三联成功(trifecta)率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01ac/5419918/802e8de53559/medi-96-e6771-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01ac/5419918/802e8de53559/medi-96-e6771-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01ac/5419918/802e8de53559/medi-96-e6771-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcomes of robot-assisted simple enucleation of renal masses: A single European center experience.机器人辅助肾肿物单纯剜除术的疗效:欧洲单一中心经验
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 May;96(18):e6771. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006771.
2
Impact of Resection Technique on Perioperative Outcomes and Surgical Margins after Partial Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Masses: A Prospective Multicenter Study.局部肾肿瘤行部分肾切除术时切除技术对围手术期结局和手术切缘的影响:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
J Urol. 2020 Mar;203(3):496-504. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000591. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
3
Functional and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted simple enucleation with and without renal arterial cold perfusion in complex renal tumors: a propensity score-matched analysis.机器人辅助单纯剜除术联合和不联合肾动脉低温灌注治疗复杂肾肿瘤的功能和肿瘤学结果:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Urol. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00771-7.
4
Robot-assisted Simple Enucleation Versus Standard Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Low- or Intermediate-complexity, Clinical T1 Renal Tumors: A Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial.机器人辅助单纯肾肿瘤剜除术与标准机器人辅助肾部分切除术治疗低复杂性或中复杂性临床 T1 期肾肿瘤的随机对照非劣效性试验。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2024 Apr;7(2):275-281. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.019. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
5
Trifecta Outcomes of Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for T1a and T1b Renal Tumors: A Single-Center Experience in a Tertiary Care Institution.T1a和T1b期肾肿瘤腹腔镜部分肾切除术的三联结局:三级医疗机构的单中心经验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Jun;29(6):790-795. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0756. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
6
Does training of fellows affect peri-operative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy?fellows的培训是否会影响机器人辅助部分肾切除术的围手术期结果?
BJU Int. 2017 Oct;120(4):591-599. doi: 10.1111/bju.13901. Epub 2017 May 24.
7
Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for T1b Tumors: Strict Trifecta Outcomes.机器人辅助T1b期肿瘤部分肾切除术:严格的三连胜结局。
JSLS. 2017 Jan-Mar;21(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2016.00113.
8
Endoscopic Robot-assisted Simple Enucleation Versus Laparoscopic Simple Enucleation With Single-layer Renorrhaphy in Localized Renal Tumors: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis From a High-volume Centre.内镜机器人辅助单纯剜除术与腹腔镜单纯剜除术联合单层肾缝合术治疗局限性肾肿瘤:来自高容量中心的倾向评分匹配分析
Urology. 2018 Nov;121:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.08.015. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
9
R-LESS partial nephrectomy trifecta outcome is inferior to multiport robotic partial nephrectomy: comparative analysis.R-LESS 部分肾切除术三联征结局劣于多通道机器人辅助部分肾切除术:比较分析。
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):512-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.058. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
10
Comparison of Trifecta and Pentafecta Outcomes between T1a and T1b Renal Masses following Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) with Minimum One Year Follow Up: Can RAPN for T1b Renal Masses Be Feasible?机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)后T1a和T1b肾肿块的三联和五联结局比较:至少随访一年:T1b肾肿块的RAPN是否可行?
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 17;11(3):e0151738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151738. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Positive surgical margins and local recurrence after simple enucleation and standard partial nephrectomy for malignant renal tumors: systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of prevalence.恶性肾肿瘤单纯剜除术和标准部分肾切除术后切缘阳性及局部复发情况:文献系统综述及患病率的Meta分析
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Dec;69(6):523-538. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02864-8. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
2
Simple enucleation for the treatment of highly complex renal tumors: Perioperative, functional and oncological results.单纯剜除术治疗高度复杂肾肿瘤:围手术期、功能及肿瘤学结果
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul;41(7):934-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.02.019. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
3
Trifecta and optimal perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in surgical treatment of small renal masses: a multi-institutional study.
机器人辅助与腹腔镜下肾部分切除术治疗小肾肿瘤的围手术期三连胜及最佳结局:一项多机构研究
BJU Int. 2015 Sep;116(3):407-14. doi: 10.1111/bju.12933. Epub 2015 May 5.
4
Endoscopic robot-assisted simple enucleation (ERASE) for clinical T1 renal masses: description of the technique and early postoperative results.临床T1期肾肿块的内镜机器人辅助单纯剜除术(ERASE):技术描述及术后早期结果
Surg Endosc. 2015 May;29(5):1241-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3807-0. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
5
Standardized reporting of resection technique during nephron-sparing surgery: the surface-intermediate-base margin score.肾部分切除术时的标准切除技术报告:表面-中间-基底切缘评分。
Eur Urol. 2014 Nov;66(5):803-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.002. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
6
Positive surgical margins in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of oncologic outcomes (leave no tumor behind).机器人辅助部分肾切除术的阳性手术切缘:肿瘤学结果的多机构分析(无肿瘤残留)。
J Urol. 2013 Nov;190(5):1674-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.110. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
7
"Trifecta" in partial nephrectomy.肾部分切除术的“三联征”。
J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.042. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
8
Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy preserves renal function: a multi-institutional propensity score analysis.离夹机器人辅助部分肾切除术保留肾功能:多机构倾向评分分析。
Eur Urol. 2013 Dec;64(6):988-93. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.009. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
9
Comparative outcomes and assessment of trifecta in 500 robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy cases: a single surgeon experience.500 例机器人和腹腔镜部分肾切除术的 trifecta 比较结果和评估:单外科医生经验。
J Urol. 2013 Apr;189(4):1236-42. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.021. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
10
Simple enucleation versus radical nephrectomy in the treatment of pT1a and pT1b renal cell carcinoma.单纯切除术与根治性肾切除术治疗 T1a 期和 T1b 期肾细胞癌。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Feb;19(2):694-700. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2003-x. Epub 2011 Aug 23.