Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜辅助腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞与超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛缓解的效果:随机对照试验

Laparoscopic-assisted Tranversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Versus Ultrasonography-guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Postlaparoscopic Cholecystectomy Pain Relief: Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Ravichandran Niranjan T, Sistla Sarath C, Kundra Pankaj, Ali S Manwar, Dhanapal Baskaran, Galidevara Indira

机构信息

Departments of *General Surgery †Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Aug;27(4):228-232. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000405.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is usually given under ultrasound guidance. Laparoscopic-assisted TAP block has been suggested as an alternative to ultrasonogram (USG)-guided block as it is less time consuming and does not need extra equipments. This study was done to compare the efficacy of both the techniques.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a randomized controlled trial between October 2012 and June 2014 involving adult patients with symptomatic gall stone disease. Patients were randomly assigned to laparoscopic or ultrasound-guided TAP block. Both groups were compared for amount of opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting, bowel movements, peak expiratory flow rate, and time taken for administering the block.

RESULTS

We included 60 adult patients in our study. The groups were comparable with respect to demographic characteristics, symptomatology, comorbidities, and intraoperative complications. Amount of opioid consumption and postoperative pain relief were comparable between the 2 groups. The time taken for laparoscopy-assisted block was shorter when compared with the time taken for USG-guided block (P≤0.05). Postoperative nausea and vomiting, bowel movements, and peak expiratory flow rate were comparable between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy-assisted TAP block is faster and equally efficacious when compared with USG-guided block and has a definite role in centers where ultrasound is not available in operating rooms.

摘要

目的

腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛的腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞通常在超声引导下进行。腹腔镜辅助TAP阻滞已被提议作为超声(USG)引导阻滞的替代方法,因为它耗时较少且不需要额外设备。本研究旨在比较这两种技术的疗效。

患者与方法

我们在2012年10月至2014年6月期间进行了一项随机对照试验,纳入有症状胆结石疾病的成年患者。患者被随机分配至接受腹腔镜或超声引导的TAP阻滞。比较两组的阿片类药物消耗量、术后疼痛评分、术后恶心呕吐、肠道蠕动、呼气峰值流速以及实施阻滞所需时间。

结果

我们的研究纳入了60例成年患者。两组在人口统计学特征、症状、合并症及术中并发症方面具有可比性。两组之间的阿片类药物消耗量及术后疼痛缓解情况相当。与超声引导阻滞相比,腹腔镜辅助阻滞所需时间更短(P≤0.05)。两组术后恶心呕吐、肠道蠕动及呼气峰值流速相当。

结论

与超声引导阻滞相比,腹腔镜辅助TAP阻滞速度更快且疗效相当,在手术室没有超声设备的中心具有明确作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验