Ravichandran Niranjan T, Sistla Sarath C, Kundra Pankaj, Ali S Manwar, Dhanapal Baskaran, Galidevara Indira
Departments of *General Surgery †Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Aug;27(4):228-232. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000405.
Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is usually given under ultrasound guidance. Laparoscopic-assisted TAP block has been suggested as an alternative to ultrasonogram (USG)-guided block as it is less time consuming and does not need extra equipments. This study was done to compare the efficacy of both the techniques.
We conducted a randomized controlled trial between October 2012 and June 2014 involving adult patients with symptomatic gall stone disease. Patients were randomly assigned to laparoscopic or ultrasound-guided TAP block. Both groups were compared for amount of opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting, bowel movements, peak expiratory flow rate, and time taken for administering the block.
We included 60 adult patients in our study. The groups were comparable with respect to demographic characteristics, symptomatology, comorbidities, and intraoperative complications. Amount of opioid consumption and postoperative pain relief were comparable between the 2 groups. The time taken for laparoscopy-assisted block was shorter when compared with the time taken for USG-guided block (P≤0.05). Postoperative nausea and vomiting, bowel movements, and peak expiratory flow rate were comparable between the 2 groups.
Laparoscopy-assisted TAP block is faster and equally efficacious when compared with USG-guided block and has a definite role in centers where ultrasound is not available in operating rooms.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛的腹横肌平面(TAP)阻滞通常在超声引导下进行。腹腔镜辅助TAP阻滞已被提议作为超声(USG)引导阻滞的替代方法,因为它耗时较少且不需要额外设备。本研究旨在比较这两种技术的疗效。
我们在2012年10月至2014年6月期间进行了一项随机对照试验,纳入有症状胆结石疾病的成年患者。患者被随机分配至接受腹腔镜或超声引导的TAP阻滞。比较两组的阿片类药物消耗量、术后疼痛评分、术后恶心呕吐、肠道蠕动、呼气峰值流速以及实施阻滞所需时间。
我们的研究纳入了60例成年患者。两组在人口统计学特征、症状、合并症及术中并发症方面具有可比性。两组之间的阿片类药物消耗量及术后疼痛缓解情况相当。与超声引导阻滞相比,腹腔镜辅助阻滞所需时间更短(P≤0.05)。两组术后恶心呕吐、肠道蠕动及呼气峰值流速相当。
与超声引导阻滞相比,腹腔镜辅助TAP阻滞速度更快且疗效相当,在手术室没有超声设备的中心具有明确作用。