College of Food Science and Engineering/Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Grain Circulation and Safety/Key Laboratory of Grains and Oils Quality Control and Processing, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing, 210023, China.
J Texture Stud. 2018 Feb;49(1):38-46. doi: 10.1111/jtxs.12275. Epub 2017 May 25.
The development of wheat-based foods that are enriched with proteins is increasingly popular due to consumer demand regarding food nutritional content and quality. This study was performed to compare the effect of whey and soy protein on the rheological properties of wheat dough and bread-making quality in a relatively wide range of protein addition (0-30%). We found that the incorporation of whey protein (WP) decreased dough stability time (MST), minimum torque (MMT), G' and G″, but increased dough peak torque (MPT), stickiness, G' and G″ in temperature sweep. With the increasing level of WP from 0 to 30%, the specific volume of bread initially decreased from 2.61 to 2.22 cm /g, then increased to 3.08 cm /g when WP was at higher concentration than gluten. However, the crumb hardness increased from 173 to 1291 g at the same time. As a contrast, the addition of soy protein (SP) increased dough MST, MMT, G' and G″, but decreased MPT, stickiness, G' and G″ in temperature sweep. With the increasing level of SP from 0 to 30%, the specific volume of bread decreased from 2.61 to 1.31 cm /g and the hardness first decreased from 173 to 152 g, then increased to 696 g. The results suggested that selection of the protein source and amount with appropriate functionalities played an important role in certain applications for protein fortified bakery products.
Since it is known that the gluten network is responsible for viscoelastic properties in wheat dough and for dough structure strength and gas retention, most studies reported that enrichment of foreign proteins interfered with gluten development and therefore, had negative effects on bread quality. This study compared the effects of whey and soy proteins on the thermomechanical, dynamic rheological and microstructural properties of wheat dough and bread-making quality in a relatively wide range of protein addition (0-30%). The results suggested that selection of the protein source and amount with appropriate functionalities significantly affected the structure of the dough and quality of the bread. Our study is essential for product development and process control when considering the popularity of protein fortified bakery products.
由于消费者对食品营养成分和质量的需求,富含蛋白质的小麦食品的开发越来越受欢迎。本研究旨在比较乳清蛋白(WP)和大豆蛋白对小麦面团流变特性和面包制作质量的影响,在相对较宽的蛋白质添加范围(0-30%)内进行。我们发现,乳清蛋白(WP)的加入降低了面团稳定时间(MST)、最小扭矩(MMT)、G'和 G″,但增加了面团峰值扭矩(MPT)、粘性、G'和 G″在温度扫描中。随着 WP 水平从 0 到 30%的增加,面包的比容最初从 2.61 减少到 2.22 cm /g,然后当 WP 浓度高于面筋时增加到 3.08 cm /g。然而,同时面包屑的硬度从 173 增加到 1291 g。相比之下,大豆蛋白(SP)的添加增加了面团 MST、MMT、G'和 G″,但降低了温度扫描中的 MPT、粘性、G'和 G″。随着 SP 水平从 0 到 30%的增加,面包的比容从 2.61 减少到 1.31 cm /g,硬度先从 173 减少到 152 g,然后增加到 696 g。结果表明,选择具有适当功能的蛋白质源和数量在蛋白质强化烘焙产品的某些应用中起着重要作用。
由于众所周知,面筋网络负责小麦面团的粘弹性,以及面团结构强度和气体保持,大多数研究报告称,外来蛋白质的富集干扰了面筋的发育,因此对面包质量有负面影响。本研究比较了乳清蛋白和大豆蛋白在相对较宽的蛋白质添加范围(0-30%)内对小麦面团的热机械、动态流变和微观结构特性以及面包制作质量的影响。结果表明,选择具有适当功能的蛋白质源和数量对面团结构和面包质量有显著影响。当考虑到蛋白质强化烘焙产品的流行时,我们的研究对于产品开发和工艺控制是必不可少的。