Shah Nishant R, Cheezum Michael K, Veeranna Vikas, Horgan Stephen J, Taqueti Viviany R, Murthy Venkatesh L, Foster Courtney, Hainer Jon, Daniels Karla M, Rivero Jose, Shah Amil M, Stone Peter H, Morrow David A, Steigner Michael L, Dorbala Sharmila, Blankstein Ron, Di Carli Marcelo F
Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging Program, Heart and Vascular Institute, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Lifespan Cardiovascular Institute, Brown University Alpert School of Medicine, Providence, RI.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 May 4;6(5):e005027. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005027.
Treatments for patients with myocardial ischemia in the absence of angiographic obstructive coronary artery disease are limited. In these patients, particularly those with diabetes mellitus, diffuse coronary atherosclerosis and microvascular dysfunction is a common phenotype and may be accompanied by diastolic dysfunction. Our primary aim was to determine whether ranolazine would quantitatively improve exercise-stimulated myocardial blood flow and cardiac function in symptomatic diabetic patients without obstructive coronary artery disease.
We conducted a double-blinded crossover trial with 1:1 random allocation to the order of ranolazine and placebo. At baseline and after each 4-week treatment arm, left ventricular myocardial blood flow and coronary flow reserve (CFR; primary end point) were measured at rest and after supine bicycle exercise using N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography. Resting echocardiography was also performed. Multilevel mixed-effects linear regression was used to determine treatment effects. Thirty-five patients met criteria for inclusion. Ranolazine did not significantly alter rest or postexercise left ventricular myocardial blood flow or CFR. However, patients with lower baseline CFR were more likely to experience improvement in CFR with ranolazine (=-0.401, =0.02) than with placebo (=-0.188, =0.28). In addition, ranolazine was associated with an improvement in E/septal e' (=0.001) and E/lateral e' (=0.01).
In symptomatic diabetic patients without obstructive coronary artery disease, ranolazine did not change exercise-stimulated myocardial blood flow or CFR but did modestly improve diastolic function. Patients with more severe baseline impairment in CFR may derive more benefit from ranolazine.
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01754259.
对于无血管造影显示阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的心肌缺血患者,治疗方法有限。在这些患者中,尤其是糖尿病患者,弥漫性冠状动脉粥样硬化和微血管功能障碍是常见的表型,且可能伴有舒张功能障碍。我们的主要目的是确定雷诺嗪是否能定量改善有症状的无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病糖尿病患者运动刺激的心肌血流和心脏功能。
我们进行了一项双盲交叉试验,按1:1随机分配雷诺嗪和安慰剂的给药顺序。在基线期以及每个为期4周的治疗组结束后,使用N-氨心肌灌注正电子发射断层扫描在静息状态和仰卧位自行车运动后测量左心室心肌血流和冠状动脉血流储备(CFR;主要终点)。还进行了静息超声心动图检查。采用多级混合效应线性回归来确定治疗效果。35名患者符合纳入标准。雷诺嗪未显著改变静息或运动后左心室心肌血流或CFR。然而,基线CFR较低的患者使用雷诺嗪时CFR改善的可能性(=-0.401,=0.02)高于使用安慰剂时(=-0.188,=0.28)。此外,雷诺嗪与E/室间隔e'(=0.001)和E/侧壁e'(=0.01)的改善相关。
在有症状的无阻塞性冠状动脉疾病糖尿病患者中,雷诺嗪未改变运动刺激引起的心肌血流或CFR,但确实适度改善了舒张功能。基线CFR受损更严重的患者可能从雷诺嗪中获益更多。