• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[前臂桡侧游离皮瓣、股前外侧穿支皮瓣或颏下岛状皮瓣舌重建术后患者生活质量评估]

[Assessment of life quality of for patients after tongue reconstruction with radial forearm free flap, anterolateral thigh perforator flap or submental island flap].

作者信息

Zhao Yang, Xiang Jing-Zhou, Liu Fa-Yu

机构信息

Department of Stomatology, Ansteel Group Hospital. Anshan 114008, China. E-mail:

出版信息

Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2017 Feb;26(1):111-114.

PMID:28474080
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate operation-related factors and quality of life (QOL) for patients after tongue reconstruction with radial forearm free flap (RFFF), anterolateral thigh perforator flap (ALT) or submental island flap (SIF).

METHODS

Totally 59 patients, diagnosed as tongue carcinoma, received glossectomy and simultaneous reconstruction with free flaps including RFFF, ALT or SIF in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University from October 2004 to October 2014. All patients were followed up for 6 months and completed the University of Washington Quality of Life scale Version 4 questionnaires. The postoperative QOL was compared among the three groups. The data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 software package.

RESULTS

The operation duration of SIF group was significantly shorter than those of RFFF group or ALT group (P<0.05). The ALT group had a longer hospitalization time. There were statistically differences among the 3 groups regarding to the size of reconstructed defects. Action QOL score of the ALT group was significantly lower than those of RFFF group and SIF group. There was no significant difference in the total QOL score including chewing, swallowing, speech and postoperative pain among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

In summary, there may be functional disability for patients after glossectomy and simultaneous reconstruction. The quality of life would be acceptable after tongue reconstruction with RFFF, ALT and SIF.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估采用游离桡侧前臂皮瓣(RFFF)、股前外侧穿支皮瓣(ALT)或颏下岛状皮瓣(SIF)进行舌重建术后患者的手术相关因素及生活质量(QOL)。

方法

2004年10月至2014年10月期间,中国医科大学附属口腔医院口腔颌面外科共有59例被诊断为舌癌的患者接受了舌切除术,并同时采用包括RFFF、ALT或SIF在内的游离皮瓣进行重建。所有患者均接受了6个月的随访,并完成了华盛顿大学生活质量量表第4版问卷。对三组患者术后的生活质量进行比较。数据采用SPSS 21.0软件包进行分析。

结果

SIF组的手术时间明显短于RFFF组或ALT组(P<0.05)。ALT组的住院时间较长。三组在重建缺损大小方面存在统计学差异。ALT组的行动生活质量评分明显低于RFFF组和SIF组。三组在包括咀嚼、吞咽、言语和术后疼痛在内的总生活质量评分方面无显著差异。

结论

总之,舌切除并同期重建术后患者可能存在功能障碍。采用RFFF、ALT和SIF进行舌重建术后生活质量可接受。

相似文献

1
[Assessment of life quality of for patients after tongue reconstruction with radial forearm free flap, anterolateral thigh perforator flap or submental island flap].[前臂桡侧游离皮瓣、股前外侧穿支皮瓣或颏下岛状皮瓣舌重建术后患者生活质量评估]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2017 Feb;26(1):111-114.
2
[Comparison of free anterolateral thigh perforator flaps versus free forearm flap for reconstruction in elderly patients undergoing glossectomy].老年舌癌患者行舌切除术后应用游离股前外侧穿支皮瓣与游离前臂皮瓣修复的比较
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 9;52(1):34-38. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2017.01.007.
3
Comparison of Oral Function: Free Anterolateral Thigh Perforator Flaps Versus Vascularized Free Forearm Flap for Reconstruction in Patients Undergoing Glossectomy.口腔功能比较:游离股前外侧穿支皮瓣与游离带血管蒂前臂皮瓣在舌癌切除术后患者重建中的应用
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul;74(7):1500.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.03.039. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
4
Functional assessment: Free thin anterolateral thigh flap versus free radial forearm reconstruction for hemiglossectomy defects.功能评估:游离股前外侧薄皮瓣与游离桡骨前臂皮瓣修复半舌切除术后缺损的比较
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015 Nov 1;20(6):e757-62. doi: 10.4317/medoral.20727.
5
Microvascular free tissue transfer for tongue reconstruction after hemiglossectomy: a functional assessment of radial forearm versus anterolateral thigh flap.半侧舌切除术后微血管游离组织移植重建舌部:桡侧前臂皮瓣与股前外侧皮瓣的功能评估
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Nov;66(11):2270-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.018.
6
Free radial forearm flap and anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of hemiglossectomy defects: A comparison of quality of life.游离桡侧前臂皮瓣和股前外侧皮瓣修复半舌切除缺损:生活质量比较。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Dec;46(12):2157-2163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
7
Profunda Artery Perforator Flap Tongue Reconstruction: An Effective and Safe Alternative to the Anterolateral Thigh Flap.股深动脉穿支皮瓣舌重建:一种有效且安全的股前外侧皮瓣替代方法。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Jun 1;153(6):1191e-1200e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010890. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
8
Submental island flap reconstruction reduces cost in oral cancer reconstruction compared to radial forearm free flap reconstruction: a case series and cost analysis.与桡侧前臂游离皮瓣重建相比,颏下岛状皮瓣重建降低了口腔癌重建的成本:病例系列及成本分析。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Feb 5;45:11. doi: 10.1186/s40463-016-0124-8.
9
Functional results of microvascular reconstruction after hemiglossectomy: free anterolateral thigh flap versus free forearm flap.半舌切除术后微血管重建的功能结果:游离股前外侧皮瓣与游离前臂皮瓣的比较。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2013 Dec;33(6):374-9.
10
Volumetric changes in post hemiglossectomy reconstruction with anterolateral thigh free flap versus radial forearm free flap.半舌切除术后重建中使用股前外侧游离皮瓣与桡侧前臂游离皮瓣的体积变化。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Jun;53(6):470-474. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2023.12.003. Epub 2023 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
[Research progress of pedicled flaps for defect repair and reconstruction after head and neck tumor resection].[带蒂皮瓣在头颈部肿瘤切除术后缺损修复与重建中的研究进展]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Mar 15;32(3):369-376. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201710098.