Gmel Gerhard, Rehm Jürgen
Swiss Institute for the Prevention of Alcohol and other Drug Problems, Lausanne, SwitzerlandSocial Prevention and Health Policy Research Department, Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto, CanadaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, CanadaEvidence and Information for Policy (EIP)/Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy (GPE)/Assessing Health Needs: Epidemiology and Burden of Disease (EBD), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2000 Dec;19(4):391-399. doi: 10.1080/713659432.
The objects of this study we (1) to review systematically Skog's theory of collective drinking behaviour and its interpretations by alcohol researchers, and (2) to give examples of how Skog's theory and these different interpretations have been empirically tested and to indicate how they might be tested. Based on a computer-aided search of the literature, a reconstruction of the theory and possible alternative interpretations is provided. Different interpretations of Skog's theory are possible and can be found in the literature. Surprisingly, there is little empirical evidence, especially recent evidence, to support Skog's key assumptions. Suggestions for further research are given.
(1)系统回顾斯科格的集体饮酒行为理论及其在酒精研究领域研究者们的解读;(2)举例说明斯科格的理论以及这些不同解读是如何经过实证检验的,并指出它们可能如何得到检验。基于对文献的计算机辅助检索,本文对该理论及可能的其他解读进行了重构。斯科格的理论存在不同解读,在文献中可以找到。令人惊讶的是,几乎没有实证证据,尤其是近期的证据,来支持斯科格的关键假设。本文给出了进一步研究的建议。