van Haveren Rens, Ogryczak Włodzimierz, Verduijn Gerda M, Keijzer Marleen, Heijmen Ben J M, Breedveld Sebastiaan
Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC-Cancer Institute, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Jun 7;62(11):4318-4332. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/62/11/4318. Epub 2017 May 5.
Previously, we have proposed Erasmus-iCycle, an algorithm for fully automated IMRT plan generation based on prioritised (lexicographic) multi-objective optimisation with the 2-phase ϵ-constraint (2pϵc) method. For each patient, the output of Erasmus-iCycle is a clinically favourable, Pareto optimal plan. The 2pϵc method uses a list of objective functions that are consecutively optimised, following a strict, user-defined prioritisation. The novel lexicographic reference point method (LRPM) is capable of solving multi-objective problems in a single optimisation, using a fuzzy prioritisation of the objectives. Trade-offs are made globally, aiming for large favourable gains for lower prioritised objectives at the cost of only slight degradations for higher prioritised objectives, or vice versa. In this study, the LRPM is validated for 15 head and neck cancer patients receiving bilateral neck irradiation. The generated plans using the LRPM are compared with the plans resulting from the 2pϵc method. Both methods were capable of automatically generating clinically relevant treatment plans for all patients. For some patients, the LRPM allowed large favourable gains in some treatment plan objectives at the cost of only small degradations for the others. Moreover, because of the applied single optimisation instead of multiple optimisations, the LRPM reduced the average computation time from 209.2 to 9.5 min, a speed-up factor of 22 relative to the 2pϵc method.
此前,我们提出了伊拉斯谟-iCycle算法,这是一种基于优先(字典序)多目标优化和两阶段ε约束(2pϵc)方法的全自动调强放疗计划生成算法。对于每位患者,伊拉斯谟-iCycle的输出是一个临床适宜的帕累托最优计划。2pϵc方法使用一系列目标函数,按照严格的、用户定义的优先级依次进行优化。新颖的字典序参考点方法(LRPM)能够在单次优化中解决多目标问题,采用目标的模糊优先级。权衡是全局进行的,目标是为优先级较低的目标获得大幅有利增益,而仅以优先级较高的目标略有退化作为代价,反之亦然。在本研究中,LRPM在15例接受双侧颈部照射的头颈癌患者中得到验证。将使用LRPM生成的计划与2pϵc方法得到的计划进行比较。两种方法都能够为所有患者自动生成临床相关的治疗计划。对于一些患者,LRPM在某些治疗计划目标上允许大幅有利增益,而仅以其他目标的小幅退化作为代价。此外,由于采用了单次优化而非多次优化,LRPM将平均计算时间从209.2分钟减少到了9.5分钟,相对于2pϵc方法,加速因子为22。