Ravindra Vijay M, Dewan Michael C, Akbari Hassan, Bollo Robert J, Limbrick David, Jea Andrew, Naftel Robert P, Riva-Cambrin Jay K
Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Primary Chil-dren's Hospital, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Department of Neurosurgery, Divi-sion of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vander-bilt, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Ten-nessee.
Neurosurgery. 2017 Sep 1;81(3):473-480. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx094.
Blunt cerebrovascular injury is uncommon in the pediatric population; penetrating cerebrovascular injuries are even rarer and are thus poorly understood.
To describe the diagnosis and management of penetrating cerebrovascular injuries and describe outcomes of available treatment modalities.
Clinical and radiographic data were collected retrospectively from a multicenter trauma registry for children screened for cerebrovascular injury during 2003 to 2013 at 4 academic pediatric trauma centers.
Among 645 pediatric patients evaluated with computed tomography angiography with blunt cerebrovascular injury, 130 also had a penetrating trauma indication. Seven penetrating cerebrovascular injuries were diagnosed in 7 male patients (mean age 12.4 years, range 12-18 years). Focal neurological deficit and concomitant intracranial injury were each seen in 2 patients. There were 2 intracranial carotid artery injuries, 4 extracranial carotid artery injuries, and 1 vertebral artery injury. The majority of injuries were higher than grade I (5/7; 71%): 2 were grade I, 1 grade II, 2 grade III, and 2 grade IV. The 2 patients with grade III injuries required open surgery, and 1 patient with a grade IV injury underwent endovascular treatment. Two patients suffered immediate stroke secondary to the penetrating cerebrovascular injury. There were no delayed neurological deficits from the penetrating injuries, and no patients died as a result of the injuries.
This is the largest series of penetrating cerebrovascular trauma in the pediatric literature. Although rare, penetrating cerebrovascular injuries can be high-grade injuries that require urgent recognition and may require aggressive endovascular and/or open surgery for treatment.
钝性脑血管损伤在儿科人群中并不常见;穿透性脑血管损伤更为罕见,因此人们对其了解甚少。
描述穿透性脑血管损伤的诊断和治疗,并描述现有治疗方式的结果。
回顾性收集2003年至2013年期间在4个学术性儿科创伤中心接受脑血管损伤筛查的儿童多中心创伤登记处的临床和影像学数据。
在645例接受计算机断层血管造影评估钝性脑血管损伤的儿科患者中,130例也有穿透性创伤指征。7例男性患者(平均年龄12.4岁,范围12 - 18岁)被诊断为穿透性脑血管损伤。2例患者出现局灶性神经功能缺损和并发颅内损伤。有2例颅内颈动脉损伤、4例颅外颈动脉损伤和1例椎动脉损伤。大多数损伤高于I级(5/7;71%):2例为I级,1例为II级,2例为III级,2例为IV级。2例III级损伤患者需要进行开放手术,1例IV级损伤患者接受了血管内治疗。2例患者因穿透性脑血管损伤继发立即中风。穿透性损伤没有导致延迟性神经功能缺损,也没有患者因损伤死亡。
这是儿科文献中最大系列的穿透性脑血管创伤。尽管罕见,但穿透性脑血管损伤可能是高级别损伤,需要紧急识别,可能需要积极的血管内和/或开放手术治疗。