• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国放射学会(ACR)关于偶然发现管理的白皮书发布后胰腺局灶性囊性病变的随访建议

Focal Cystic Pancreatic Lesion Follow-up Recommendations After Publication of ACR White Paper on Managing Incidental Findings.

作者信息

Bobbin Mark D, Ip Ivan K, Sahni V Anik, Shinagare Atul B, Khorasani Ramin

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Radiology and Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Jun;14(6):757-764. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.044. Epub 2017 May 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.044
PMID:28476609
Abstract

PURPOSE

To describe the variation in radiologists' follow-up recommendations for focal cystic pancreatic lesions (FCPL) after publication of the 2010 ACR incidental findings White Paper and determine adherence to guidance of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee.

METHODS

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this retrospective, HIPAA-compliant observational study. Patients with FCPL were identified from abdominal CT and MRI reports generated in 2013 using natural language processing software. Patient-, lesion-, and radiologist-specific variables were recorded. Primary outcome was whether a follow-up recommendation was made, and if it included a specific study or intervention and recommended time for follow-up. χ and logistic regression models were used to identify predictors and controlled for recommendation. These data were compared with 2009 data obtained before the White Paper's publication. Secondary outcome was adherence to the ACR's guidance.

RESULTS

During calendar year 2013, 1,377 reports describing FCPLs were identified in 1,038 patients. After excluding examinations from low-volume readers (n = 80), radiologists recommended follow-up imaging in 13.5% (175/1,297) of cases, a decrease from 2009 when it was recommended in 23.7% (221/933) of cases (P < .001). Findings were consistent across radiologists after controlling for patient- and lesion-specific variables. Variability in follow-up recommendations persists between radiologists (2.4-fold difference in 2013 versus 2.8-fold difference in 2009). Radiologists adhered to ACR guidance principles 47.4% of the time.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite published guidance recommendations and reported awareness of them, fewer than half of follow-up recommendations for FCPL are consistent with the guidance and considerable variability persists among radiologists.

摘要

目的

描述放射科医生对胰腺局灶性囊性病变(FCPL)的随访建议在2010年美国放射学会(ACR)偶然发现白皮书发表后的变化情况,并确定对ACR偶然发现委员会指南的遵循情况。

方法

本回顾性、符合健康保险流通与责任法案(HIPAA)的观察性研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准。使用自然语言处理软件从2013年生成的腹部CT和MRI报告中识别出患有FCPL的患者。记录患者、病变和放射科医生特定的变量。主要结果是是否提出了随访建议,以及是否包括特定的检查或干预措施以及建议的随访时间。使用χ检验和逻辑回归模型来识别预测因素并对建议进行控制。将这些数据与白皮书发表前的2009年数据进行比较。次要结果是对ACR指南的遵循情况。

结果

在2013日历年期间,在1038名患者中识别出1377份描述FCPL的报告。排除低工作量阅片者的检查(n = 80)后,放射科医生在13.5%(175/1297)的病例中建议进行随访成像,较2009年有所下降,2009年在23.7%(221/933)的病例中建议进行随访成像(P <.001)。在控制了患者和病变特定变量后,放射科医生的结果一致。放射科医生之间随访建议的变异性仍然存在(2013年为2.4倍差异,2009年为2.8倍差异)。放射科医生在47.4%的时间内遵循了ACR指南原则。

结论

尽管有已发表的指南建议且报告了对这些建议的知晓情况,但对FCPL的随访建议中不到一半与指南一致,放射科医生之间仍存在相当大的变异性。

相似文献

1
Focal Cystic Pancreatic Lesion Follow-up Recommendations After Publication of ACR White Paper on Managing Incidental Findings.美国放射学会(ACR)关于偶然发现管理的白皮书发布后胰腺局灶性囊性病变的随访建议
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Jun;14(6):757-764. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.044. Epub 2017 May 3.
2
Focal cystic pancreatic lesions: assessing variation in radiologists' management recommendations.局灶性囊性胰腺病变:评估放射科医生的管理建议的差异。
Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):136-41. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100970. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
3
Variation in Radiologists' Follow-Up Imaging Recommendations for Small Cystic Pancreatic Lesions.放射科医生对小囊性胰腺病变随访影像学建议的差异。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Oct;18(10):1405-1414. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.06.007. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
4
ACR members' response to JACR white paper on the management of incidental abdominal CT findings.ACR 成员对 JACR 关于腹部 CT 偶然发现的管理的白皮书的回应。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Jan;11(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
5
A Multidisciplinary Approach to Improving Appropriate Follow-Up Imaging of Ovarian Cysts: A Quality Improvement Initiative.一种改善卵巢囊肿适当随访成像的多学科方法:一项质量改进计划。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 May;13(5):535-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.01.015. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
6
Downstream Costs Associated With Incidental Pancreatic Cysts Detected at MRI.MRI 检测到偶然胰腺囊肿的下游成本。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Dec;211(6):1278-1282. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19885. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
7
Management of Incidental Pancreatic Cysts: A White Paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee.偶然发现的胰腺囊肿的管理:美国放射学会偶然发现委员会白皮书
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Jul;14(7):911-923. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 May 19.
8
Management of Incidental Liver Lesions on CT: A White Paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee.CT检查中肝脏偶发病变的管理:美国放射学会偶发发现委员会白皮书
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Nov;14(11):1429-1437. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.07.018. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
9
MDCT vs. MRI for incidental pancreatic cysts: measurement variability and impact on clinical management.多层螺旋 CT 与 MRI 对偶然发现的胰腺囊肿:测量变异性及其对临床管理的影响。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Feb;42(2):521-530. doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0883-8.
10
Management of Incidental Pituitary Findings on CT, MRI, and F-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET: A White Paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee.CT、MRI 和 F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖 PET 偶然发现的垂体病变的处理:ACR 偶然发现委员会的白皮书。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Jul;15(7):966-972. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.037. Epub 2018 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Actionability of Recommendations for Additional Imaging in Head and Neck Radiology.头颈部放射学中额外成像建议的可操作性。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2024 Jul;21(7):1040-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.01.005. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
2
Understanding the performance and reliability of NLP tools: a comparison of four NLP tools predicting stroke phenotypes in radiology reports.了解自然语言处理工具的性能和可靠性:四种自然语言处理工具在放射学报告中预测中风表型的比较。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Sep 28;5:1184919. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1184919. eCollection 2023.
3
Standardized Follow-Up Recommendations Improve Reporting of Incidental Renal Lesions in a Community Setting.
标准化随访建议可改善社区环境中偶然发现的肾脏病变的报告情况。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 22;15(6):e40828. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40828. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Development and Assessment of an Information Technology Intervention to Improve the Clarity of Radiologist Follow-up Recommendations.开发和评估信息技术干预措施,以提高放射科医生随访建议的清晰度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e236178. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.6178.
5
A systematic review of natural language processing applied to radiology reports.自然语言处理在放射学报告中的应用的系统评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jun 3;21(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01533-7.
6
Physician Agreement With Recommendations Contained in a National Guideline for the Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules: A Case Study.医生对国家偶然发现的肺结节管理指南中所含建议的认同:一项案例研究
J Am Coll Radiol. 2020 Nov;17(11):1437-1442. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.07.020. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
7
Variation in Follow-up Imaging Recommendations in Radiology Reports: Patient, Modality, and Radiologist Predictors.影像学报告中随访影像学建议的变化:患者、检查方式和放射科医生的预测因素。
Radiology. 2019 Jun;291(3):700-707. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182826. Epub 2019 May 7.
8
Use of Machine Learning to Identify Follow-Up Recommendations in Radiology Reports.利用机器学习识别放射学报告中的随访建议。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Mar;16(3):336-343. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.10.020. Epub 2018 Dec 29.