CEA/DRF/IRAMIS/LIDYL-UMR 9222, LIDYL, CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France.
J Chem Phys. 2017 May 7;146(17):174303. doi: 10.1063/1.4982252.
The study of the thermodynamics and structures of iron clusters has been carried on, focusing on small clusters and initial icosahedral and fcc-cuboctahedral structures. Two combined tools are used. First, energy intervals are explored by the Monte Carlo algorithm, called σ-mapping, detailed in the work of Soudan et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 135, 144109 (2011), Paper I]. In its flat histogram version, it provides the classical density of states, g(E), in terms of the potential energy of the system. Second, the iron system is described by a potential which is called "corrected EAM" (cEAM), explained in the work of Basire et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 141, 104304 (2014), Paper II]. Small clusters from 3 to 12 atoms in their ground state have been compared first with published Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations, giving a complete agreement of geometries. The series of 13, 55, 147, and 309 atom icosahedrons is shown to be the most stable form for the cEAM potential. However, the 147 atom cluster has a special behaviour, since decreasing the energy from the liquid zone leads to the irreversible trapping of the cluster in a reproducible amorphous state, 7.38 eV higher in energy than the icosahedron. This behaviour is not observed at the higher size of 309 atoms. The heat capacity of the 55, 147, and 309 atom clusters revealed a pronounced peak in the solid zone, related to a solid-solid transition, prior to the melting peak. The corresponding series of 13, 55, and 147 atom cuboctahedrons has been compared, underscoring the unstability towards the icosahedral structure. This unstability occurs clearly in several steps for the 147 atom cluster, with a sudden transformation at a transition state. This illustrates the concerted icosahedron-cuboctahedron transformation of Buckminster Fuller-Mackay, which is calculated for the cEAM potential. Two other clusters of initial fcc structures with 24 and 38 atoms have been studied, as well as a 302 atom cluster. Each one relaxes towards a more stable structure without regularity. The 38 atom cluster exhibits a nearly glassy relaxation, through a cascade of six metastable states of long life. This behaviour, as that of the 147 atom cluster towards the amorphous state, shows that difficulties to reach ergodicity in the lower half of the solid zone are related to particular features of the potential energy landscape, and not necessarily to a too large size of the system. Comparisons of the cEAM iron system with published results about Lennard-Jones systems and DFT calculations are made. The results of the previous clusters have been combined with that of Paper II to plot the cohesive energy E and the melting temperature T in terms of the cluster atom number N. The N linear dependence of the melting temperature (Pawlow law) is observed again for N > 150. In contrast, for N < 150, the curve diverges strongly from the Pawlow law, giving it an overall V-shape, with a linear increase of T when N goes from 55 to 13 atoms. Surprisingly, the 38 atom cluster is anomalously below the overall curve.
已经对铁团簇的热力学和结构进行了研究,重点是小型团簇以及初始的二十面体和面心立方-八面体结构。使用了两种组合工具。首先,通过称为“σ映射”的蒙特卡罗算法(见 Soudan 等人的工作[J. Chem. Phys. 135, 144109 (2011), Paper I])探索能量间隔。在其平坦直方图版本中,它提供了系统势能的经典态密度(g(E))。其次,铁系统由称为“修正 EAM”(cEAM)的势来描述,该势在 Basire 等人的工作[J. Chem. Phys. 141, 104304 (2014), Paper II]中有解释。首先比较了处于基态的 3 到 12 个原子的小团簇,与已发表的密度泛函理论(DFT)计算结果完全一致,具有完全一致的几何形状。展示了 cEAM 势最稳定的形式是 13、55、147 和 309 个原子的二十面体。然而,147 个原子团簇表现出特殊的行为,因为从液态区降低能量会导致团簇不可逆转地捕获到可重复的非晶态,比二十面体高 7.38 eV。在更高的 309 个原子尺寸下,不会观察到这种行为。55、147 和 309 个原子团簇的热容在固态区显示出明显的峰值,与固态-固态转变有关,然后是熔化峰值。对相应的 13、55 和 147 个原子的面心立方八面体系列进行了比较,突出了在熔融峰值之前的固态区中固-固转变的不稳定性。147 个原子团簇的不稳定性明显分几个步骤发生,在过渡态有一个突然的转变。这说明了富勒-麦凯的协同二十面体-面心立方八面体转变,这是为 cEAM 势计算的。还研究了两个具有 24 和 38 个原子的初始面心立方结构的团簇,以及一个 302 个原子的团簇。每个团簇都朝着更稳定的结构弛豫,没有规则性。38 个原子团簇表现出几乎玻璃状的弛豫,通过六个长寿命的亚稳态级联。这种行为,就像 147 个原子团簇向非晶态的行为一样,表明在固态区的下半部分难以达到遍历性与势能景观的特定特征有关,而不一定与系统的尺寸过大有关。对 cEAM 铁系统与已发表的关于 Lennard-Jones 系统和 DFT 计算的结果进行了比较。将以前的团簇的结果与 Paper II 相结合,以表示团簇原子数 N 的形式绘制结合能 E 和熔化温度 T。对于 N > 150,再次观察到熔化温度的 N 线性依赖性(Pawlow 定律)。相比之下,对于 N < 150,曲线强烈偏离 Pawlow 定律,整体呈 V 形,当 N 从 55 增加到 13 个原子时,T 呈线性增加。令人惊讶的是,38 个原子团簇异常低于整体曲线。