Jaspers M W, Mantas J, Borycki E, Hasman A
Yearb Med Inform. 2017 Aug;26(1):252-256. doi: 10.15265/IY-2017-011. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
The educational activities initiated by the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) have had global impacts and influenced national societies and local academic programs in the field of Biomedical and Health Informatics (BMHI). After the successful publication and dissemination of its educational recommendations, IMIA launched an accreditation procedure for educational programs in BMHI. The accreditation procedure was pilot tested by several BMHI academic programs in different countries and continents to obtain a global perspective. This paper presents an overview of IMIA quality assurance and accreditation procedures along with feedback on issues and problems which emerged during the pilot. It appears that IMIA quality assurance and procedures worked quite well in different countries of Europe, the Middle East, South America, and Asia. These first experiences provided adequate information for adapting, modifying, and optimizing the procedures and finally for the planning of future activities. IMIA accreditation framework comprises a single set of standards that apply at various levels to both academic and professional BMHI programs. The pilot phase confirmed the robustness and generalizability of quality assurance standards and associated procedures on which IMIA accreditation is based at an international level.
国际医学信息学协会(IMIA)发起的教育活动产生了全球影响,并对生物医学与健康信息学(BMHI)领域的国家协会和地方学术项目产生了影响。在成功发布并传播其教育建议后,IMIA启动了BMHI教育项目的认证程序。该认证程序在不同国家和各大洲的多个BMHI学术项目中进行了试点测试,以获得全球视角。本文概述了IMIA的质量保证和认证程序,并反馈了试点过程中出现的问题。看来,IMIA的质量保证和程序在欧洲、中东、南美和亚洲的不同国家运行得相当良好。这些初步经验为调整、修改和优化程序以及最终规划未来活动提供了充分的信息。IMIA认证框架包括一套适用于各级学术和专业BMHI项目的单一标准。试点阶段证实了质量保证标准及相关程序的稳健性和通用性,IMIA认证正是基于这些标准在国际层面开展的。