Suppr超能文献

与蒙提霍尔难题任务学习相关的大脑活动。

Brain activities associated with learning of the Monty Hall Dilemma task.

机构信息

Graduate School of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Japan.

Department of Psychology, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Psychophysiology. 2017 Sep;54(9):1359-1369. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12883. Epub 2017 May 8.

Abstract

The Monty Hall Dilemma (MHD) poses a counterintuitive probabilistic problem to the players of this game. In the MHD task, a participant chooses one of three options where only one contains a reward. After one of the unchosen options (always no reward) is disclosed, the participant is asked to make a final decision: either change to the remaining option or stick with their first choice. Although the probability of winning if they change is higher (2/3) compared to sticking with their first choice (1/3), most people stick with their original selection and often lose. In accordance with previous research, repetitive exposure to the MHD task increases the change behavior without any obvious understanding of the mathematical reasons why changing increases their chance of being rewarded. We recorded the stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN), an ERP that might reflect the informative value of the feedback. In the second half of the task, feedback was predicted to be less informative because learning had taken place. Indeed, the SPN amplitude became smaller over the frontal region. Also, the SPN amplitude was larger for change than for stick trials. These results suggest that learning in the MHD might be manifest in affective-motivational anticipation as indicated by the SPN.

摘要

蒙提霍尔问题(MHD)向该游戏的玩家提出了一个反直觉的概率问题。在 MHD 任务中,参与者从三个选项中选择一个,只有一个选项包含奖励。在披露一个未选中的选项(始终没有奖励)后,参与者被要求做出最终决定:是改变到剩余的选项还是坚持最初的选择。尽管改变的获胜概率(2/3)高于坚持最初选择的获胜概率(1/3),但大多数人坚持最初的选择,结果往往会输。根据之前的研究,重复接触 MHD 任务会增加改变的行为,而没有明显理解为什么改变会增加他们获得奖励的机会的数学原因。我们记录了刺激前负波(SPN),这是一种可能反映反馈信息量的 ERP。在任务的后半部分,由于已经发生了学习,反馈的信息量预计会减少。事实上,SPN 的振幅在前额区域变得更小。此外,改变试次的 SPN 振幅大于坚持试次。这些结果表明,MHD 中的学习可能表现在情感动机的预期中,这由 SPN 反映出来。

相似文献

1
Brain activities associated with learning of the Monty Hall Dilemma task.
Psychophysiology. 2017 Sep;54(9):1359-1369. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12883. Epub 2017 May 8.
2
Stimulus-preceding negativity represents a conservative response tendency.
Neuroreport. 2016 Jan 20;27(2):80-4. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000495.
3
6
A new version of the Monty Hall Dilemma with unequal probabilities.
Behav Processes. 1999 Nov;48(1-2):25-34. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(99)00066-2.
7
The collider principle in causal reasoning: why the Monty Hall dilemma is so hard.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Sep;133(3):434-49. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.3.434.
8
Testing the limits of optimality: the effect of base rates in the Monty Hall dilemma.
Learn Behav. 2014 Mar;42(1):69-82. doi: 10.3758/s13420-013-0126-6.
9
ERP correlates of valence asymmetry during incentive anticipation.
Psychophysiology. 2018 Nov;55(11):e13213. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13213. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
10
Why Humans Fail in Solving the Monty Hall Dilemma: A Systematic Review.
Psychol Belg. 2018 Jun 1;58(1):128-158. doi: 10.5334/pb.274.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural dynamics underlying the illusion of control during reward processing.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024 Oct 10;19(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsae063.
2
Why Humans Fail in Solving the Monty Hall Dilemma: A Systematic Review.
Psychol Belg. 2018 Jun 1;58(1):128-158. doi: 10.5334/pb.274.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验