Suppr超能文献

鸽子(家鸽)、大学生和学龄前儿童(智人)在蒙提霍尔困境中的选择行为。

Choice behavior of pigeons (Columba livia), college students, and preschool children (Homo sapiens) in the Monty Hall dilemma.

作者信息

Mazur James E, Kahlbaugh Patricia E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, CT 06515, USA.

出版信息

J Comp Psychol. 2012 Nov;126(4):407-20. doi: 10.1037/a0028273. Epub 2012 May 14.

Abstract

In the Monty Hall dilemma, an individual chooses between three options, only one of which will deliver a prize. After the initial choice, one of the nonchosen options is revealed as a losing option, and the individual can choose to stay with the original choice or switch to the other remaining option. Previous studies have found that most adults stay with their initial choice, although the chances of winning are 2/3 for switching and 1/3 for staying. Pigeons, college students, and preschool children were given many trials on this task to examine how their choices might change with experience. The college students began to switch on a majority of trials much sooner than the pigeons, contrary to the findings by Herbranson and Schroeder (2010) that pigeons perform better than people on this task. In all three groups, some individuals approximated the optimal strategy of switching on every trial, but most did not. Many of the preschoolers immediately showed a pattern of always switching or always staying and continued this pattern throughout the experiment. In a condition where the probability of winning was 90% after a switch, all college students and all but one pigeon learned to switch on nearly every trial. The results suggest that one main impediment to learning the optimal strategy in the Monty Hall task, even after repeated trials, is the difficulty in discriminating the different reinforcement probabilities for switching versus staying.

摘要

在蒙提霍尔困境中,一个人要在三个选项中做出选择,其中只有一个会带来奖品。在最初的选择之后,未被选中的选项之一会被揭示为一个失败选项,然后这个人可以选择坚持原来的选择,或者转向另一个剩余的选项。先前的研究发现,大多数成年人会坚持他们最初的选择,尽管转换选择获胜的几率是2/3,而坚持原来选择获胜的几率是1/3。给鸽子、大学生和学龄前儿童进行了这项任务的多次试验,以研究他们的选择如何随经验而变化。大学生比鸽子更快地在大多数试验中开始转换选择,这与赫布兰森和施罗德(2010年)的研究结果相反,他们的研究结果是鸽子在这项任务上的表现比人类更好。在所有三个组中,一些个体接近每次试验都转换选择的最优策略,但大多数人没有。许多学龄前儿童立即表现出总是转换或总是坚持的模式,并在整个实验中持续这种模式。在一种转换选择后获胜概率为90%的情况下,所有大学生和除了一只鸽子之外的所有鸽子都学会了几乎在每次试验中都进行转换。结果表明,即使经过多次试验,在蒙提霍尔任务中学习最优策略的一个主要障碍是难以区分转换选择与坚持原来选择的不同强化概率。

相似文献

2
The Monty Hall dilemma with pigeons: No, you choose for me.
Learn Behav. 2015 Sep;43(3):209-16. doi: 10.3758/s13420-015-0172-3.
4
Further investigation of the Monty Hall Dilemma in pigeons and rats.
Behav Processes. 2015 Mar;112:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
5
Testing the limits of optimality: the effect of base rates in the Monty Hall dilemma.
Learn Behav. 2014 Mar;42(1):69-82. doi: 10.3758/s13420-013-0126-6.
6
The Monty Hall dilemma in pigeons: effect of investment in initial choice.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Oct;20(5):997-1004. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0403-6.
8
Brain activities associated with learning of the Monty Hall Dilemma task.
Psychophysiology. 2017 Sep;54(9):1359-1369. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12883. Epub 2017 May 8.
9
End the search quickly: Pigeons (Columba livia) and humans (Homo sapiens) share the same bias.
J Comp Psychol. 2022 Feb;136(1):1-2. doi: 10.1037/com0000311. Epub 2022 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Why Humans Fail in Solving the Monty Hall Dilemma: A Systematic Review.
Psychol Belg. 2018 Jun 1;58(1):128-158. doi: 10.5334/pb.274.
2
Reasoning and choice in the Monty Hall Dilemma (MHD): implications for improving Bayesian reasoning.
Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 31;6:353. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00353. eCollection 2015.
3
The Monty Hall dilemma in pigeons: effect of investment in initial choice.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Oct;20(5):997-1004. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0403-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Delay discounting: I'm a k, you're a k.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Nov;96(3):427-39. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-423.
2
Choice in quail neonates: the origins of generalized matching.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 Nov;94(3):315-26. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.94-315.
3
When less is not always more: stereotype knowledge and reasoning development.
Dev Psychol. 2011 Mar;47(2):432-41. doi: 10.1037/a0021313.
4
Matching in an undisturbed natural human environment.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2010 May;93(3):415-33. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2010.93-415.
5
Distributed versus exclusive preference in discrete-trial choice.
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Jul;36(3):321-33. doi: 10.1037/a0017588.
7
Delay-amount tradeoffs in choices by pigeons and rats: hyperbolic versus exponential discounting.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Mar;91(2):197-211. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.91-197.
8
Intuitions of probabilities shape expectations about the future at 12 months and beyond.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 27;104(48):19156-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700271104. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
9
Delay discounting of cocaine by rhesus monkeys.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007 Jun;15(3):238-44. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.15.3.238.
10
A review of delay-discounting research with humans: relations to drug use and gambling.
Behav Pharmacol. 2006 Dec;17(8):651-67. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e3280115f99.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验