Suppr超能文献

美国慢性鼻窦炎患者中球囊鼻窦成形术的应用。

Use of balloon sinuplasty in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis in the United States.

作者信息

Chaaban Mohamad R, Baillargeon Jacques G, Baillargeon Gwen, Resto Vicente, Kuo Yong-Fang

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.

Office of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.

出版信息

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017 Jun;7(6):600-608. doi: 10.1002/alr.21939. Epub 2017 May 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, the use of balloon sinuplasty has increased widely in the United States. Since its introduction, no nationally representative, population-based study has examined its use among chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with CRS between 2011 and 2014, and compared the prevalence of conventional functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), balloon sinuplasty, and hybrid sinus surgery according to surgical site and calendar year.

RESULTS

Out of 11 million to 11.4 million enrollees per year, a total of 661,738 patients with the diagnosis of CRS were included in the analyses. There was an increase in the use of balloon sinuplasty as a stand-alone procedure from 5% in 2011 to 22.5% in 2014. Conventional FESS continued to be the most commonly performed sinus procedure over the study period. Multinomial logistic regression analyses showed a linear increase in balloon sinuplasty and hybrid procedures from 2011 to 2014. Compared to patients over 60 years, patients younger than 30 years had lower odds of having a balloon sinuplasty as a stand-alone procedure compared to FESS. Compared to patients in the West, patients in the South, Northeast, and Midwest were significantly more likely to have balloon sinuplasty as a stand-alone procedure. Assessment of the sinus surgery site showed that patients with additional frontal sinus surgery were more likely to have a balloon-only procedure (odds ratio [OR], 4.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.21 to 5.17) or a hybrid procedure (OR, 8.69; 95% CI, 7.48 to 10.11) than conventional FESS when compared to patients with conventional maxillary surgery only.

CONCLUSION

From 2011 to 2014 there was an increase in the use of balloon sinuplasty and a modest decrease in the use of conventional FESS in the United States. Patients with frontal or sphenoid sinus surgical sites were more likely to have a balloon or hybrid procedure.

摘要

背景

在过去十年中,球囊鼻窦成形术在美国的应用广泛增加。自其引入以来,尚无全国代表性的、基于人群的研究考察其在慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)患者中的使用情况。

方法

我们对2011年至2014年间诊断为CRS的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究,并根据手术部位和历年情况比较了传统功能性鼻内镜鼻窦手术(FESS)、球囊鼻窦成形术和混合鼻窦手术的患病率。

结果

在每年1100万至1140万登记参与者中,共有661738例诊断为CRS的患者纳入分析。作为单独手术的球囊鼻窦成形术的使用从2011年的5%增加到2014年的22.5%。在研究期间,传统FESS仍然是最常进行的鼻窦手术。多项逻辑回归分析显示,从2011年到2014年,球囊鼻窦成形术和混合手术呈线性增加。与60岁以上的患者相比,30岁以下的患者接受单独球囊鼻窦成形术的几率低于接受FESS的几率。与西部患者相比,南部、东北部和中西部的患者接受单独球囊鼻窦成形术的可能性显著更高。鼻窦手术部位评估显示,与仅接受传统上颌窦手术的患者相比,接受额外额窦手术的患者更有可能接受单纯球囊手术(优势比[OR],4.67;95%置信区间[CI],4.21至5.17)或混合手术(OR,8.69;95%CI,7.48至10.11),而非传统FESS。

结论

2011年至2014年期间,美国球囊鼻窦成形术的使用增加,而传统FESS的使用略有下降。有额窦或蝶窦手术部位的患者更有可能接受球囊或混合手术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验