Bastani Farideh, Rajai Nahid, Farsi Zahra, Als Heidelise
1PhD, Professor, Departments of Community Health Nursing and Geriatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Iran 2MSN, Instructor, Faculty of Nursing, Department of Mother-Infant Health, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Iran 3PhD, Associate Professor, Faculty of Nursing, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Iran 4PhD, Professor of Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, and Director, Neurobehavioral Infant and Child Studies, Department of Psychiatry, Boston Children's Hospital, Massachusetts, USA.
J Nurs Res. 2017 Jun;25(3):231-239. doi: 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000194.
Developing interventions that improve deep sleep and quit awake is important to improve the quality of care that is provided to preterm infants.
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of kangaroo care and in-arms-holding on the sleep and wake states of preterm infants.
A randomized controlled trial design was employed in 2011-2012. Seventy-two stable preterm infants with gestational ages of 32-37 weeks and their mothers were recruited from the neonatal intensive care unit of Valiasr Hospital in Tehran, Iran. Seventy participants completed the trial. In the preintervention phase, nurses placed all of the infants, clad only in diapers, in supine position in their incubator for 20 minutes. Next, the infants in the kangaroo care group were placed onto their mothers' bare chest, whereas those infants in the in-arms-holding group were cradled in their mothers' arms, with the head and back supported by the mother's left arm. The intervention period lasted for 70 minutes. In the postintervention phase, the infants were returned to their incubators and placed in supine position for 20 minutes. The observer recorded the status of the infants during the three phases of study.
There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of state distribution in the preintervention phase. However, the kangaroo care group had longer periods in deep sleep (p < .001) and in the quiet awake/alert state (p = .004) during the intervention phase and less time in the light sleep or drowsy state (p < .001) and in the actively awake state (p = .02) than the in-arms-holding group. No significant group differences were found in terms of crying.
Kangaroo care appears to increase the length of time that preterm infants spend in deep sleep and quiet awake states as compared with simply being held in their mothers' arms. Replication of this research will strengthen the results.
开发能改善深度睡眠并减少清醒时间的干预措施对于提高为早产儿提供的护理质量很重要。
本研究的目的是比较袋鼠式护理和怀抱式护理对早产儿睡眠和觉醒状态的影响。
2011年至2012年采用随机对照试验设计。从伊朗德黑兰瓦利亚斯尔医院的新生儿重症监护病房招募了72名孕周为32 - 37周的稳定早产儿及其母亲。70名参与者完成了试验。在干预前阶段,护士将所有仅穿着尿布的婴儿仰卧放置在保温箱中20分钟。接下来,袋鼠式护理组的婴儿被放在母亲裸露的胸前,而怀抱式护理组的婴儿则被母亲抱在怀中,头部和背部由母亲的左臂支撑。干预期持续70分钟。在干预后阶段,婴儿被放回保温箱并仰卧放置20分钟。观察者记录了研究三个阶段中婴儿的状态。
在干预前阶段,两组在状态分布方面没有显著差异。然而,在干预期,袋鼠式护理组深度睡眠的时间更长(p <.001),安静清醒/警觉状态的时间更长(p =.004),浅睡眠或困倦状态的时间更短(p <.001),积极清醒状态的时间更短(p =.02),与怀抱式护理组相比。在哭闹方面未发现显著的组间差异。
与单纯被抱在母亲怀中相比,袋鼠式护理似乎增加了早产儿深度睡眠和安静清醒状态的时间。重复这项研究将加强研究结果。