Basu Sonali, Pollack Murray M
All authors: Department of Critical Care Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 May 5:795-799. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001194.
Pediatric critical care medicine abstracts presented at North American national academic meetings have not been followed up to determine their publication outcomes. Our objective was to determine the following: 1) the proportion of these presentations that are published in peer-reviewed journals within 5 years; 2) the impact of trainee status on time to and success of publication; and 3) the quality of the research as reflected in the publishing journal's impact factor.
Four years of abstracts (2007-2011) were reviewed from the American Academy of Pediatrics, Pediatric Academic Societies, and Society of Critical Care Medicine national meetings. Pediatric critical care medicine abstracts were delineated by the meeting or identified by keyword search. Data included mode of presentation, trainee status of first author, publication status within 5 years based on a PubMed search, trainee position in the journal of publication authorship list, and the impact factor of journal of publication.
We evaluated 267 pediatric critical care medicine abstracts, 85-94 from each meeting. Overall, 41% were published, with the highest rate in Pediatric Academic Societies abstracts (54% Pediatric Academic Societies, 38% Society of Critical Care Medicine, and 33% American Academy of Pediatrics; p = 0.011). Mean time to publication was 22 (± 3) months and did not differ by conference or presentation mode. Journal first authorship was retained in 84%. Journal impact factor was highest in Society of Critical Care Medicine abstracts (3.38 Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2.64 Pediatric Academic Societies, and 1.92 American Academy of Pediatrics; p = 0.006). First author trainee status was not associated with publication rate, time to publication, and impact factor. A total of 100% of trainees but only 79% of nontrainees who published retained first authorship.
Less than half of pediatric critical care medicine research abstracts presented at North American national academic meetings culminate in articles. Pediatric Academic Societies had the highest publication success rate, and Society of Critical Care Medicine abstracts were published in journals with the highest impact factors. All trainees who were first authors retained that status in the journal publications.
北美国家学术会议上发表的儿科重症医学摘要尚未得到后续跟进以确定其发表成果。我们的目的是确定以下几点:1)这些报告在5年内发表于同行评审期刊的比例;2)学员身份对发表时间和发表成功率的影响;3)发表期刊的影响因子所反映的研究质量。
回顾了美国儿科学会、儿科学术协会以及危重症医学会全国会议四年(2007 - 2011年)的摘要。儿科重症医学摘要通过会议进行界定或通过关键词搜索来识别。数据包括报告方式、第一作者的学员身份、基于PubMed搜索的5年内发表状态、发表期刊作者列表中学员的位置以及发表期刊的影响因子。
我们评估了267篇儿科重症医学摘要,每次会议85 - 94篇。总体而言,41%的摘要得以发表,其中儿科学术协会摘要的发表率最高(儿科学术协会为54%,危重症医学会为38%,美国儿科学会为33%;p = 0.011)。平均发表时间为22(±3)个月,且在不同会议或报告方式之间没有差异。84%的摘要在发表期刊中保留了第一作者身份。危重症医学会摘要的期刊影响因子最高(危重症医学会为3.38,儿科学术协会为2.64,美国儿科学会为1.92;p = 0.006)。第一作者的学员身份与发表率、发表时间以及影响因子均无关联。发表的学员中100%保留了第一作者身份,而非学员中只有79%保留了第一作者身份。
在北美国家学术会议上发表的儿科重症医学研究摘要中,不到一半最终形成了文章。儿科学术协会的发表成功率最高,危重症医学会摘要发表于影响因子最高的期刊。所有作为第一作者的学员在期刊发表中都保留了该身份。